fxxkandrew1 发表于 10-1-2013 08:04 PM 
根据你的回复，你认同了我第一句的论点。
第二点，请看。http://www.mpl.ird.fr/suds-en-ligne/ecosys ...
“根据你的回复，你认同了我第一句的论点。”
這一句，請問你說的是。。。？
謝謝你給我參考了那份報告，讓我獲益良多。人愛吃魚，導致食和捕魚量增加，無法永續維持：
This levelling off of the total catch followsthe general trend of most of the world’s fishing areas, which have apparently reached their maximum potential for fisheriesproduction, with the majority of stocks being fully exploited. It is thereforevery unlikely that substantialincreases in total catch will be obtained in the future.
During the 1990s the marine catch levelled outat 80-85 million tonnes per year, and by the turn of the century,three-quarters of ocean fish stockswere overfished, depleted or exploited up to their maximum sustainable yield.Further growth in the marine catch can only be modest.
該報告同時指出工業化畜牧帶給環境、公共健康和低能量轉換率的事實是需要我們予以關注的：
The growingdemand for livestock products is likely to have an undesirable impact on theenvironment. For example, there will be more large-scale,industrial production, often located close to urban centres, which brings with it a range of environmental and public healthrisks. Attempts have been made to estimate the environmental impact of industrial livestock production. For instance, it has been estimatedthat the number of people fed in a year per hectare ranges from 22 for potatoesand 19 for rice to 1 and 2, respectively, for beef and lamb (9).The low energy conversion ratio from feed to meat is anotherconcern, since some of the cereal grain foodproduced is diverted to livestock production. Likewise, land and water requirements for meatproduction are likely to become a major concern, as the increasing demand foranimal products results in more intensive livestock production systems (10).
工業化帶給環境的破壞固然是一個不支持工業化畜牧/工廠化農場的原因，但對我而言，不食用動物還有一個更重要的原因，即是不傷害生命。
肉的取得不像植物，非得經過囚禁和血腥的屠殺而來。我覺得，人類應該對動物（包括魚類）予以更多同理心，在非極端情況之下（沒有植物性食物可維持生命），不輕易地傷害牠們。
| 
发表于 11-1-2013 11:17 AM
楼主
.gif)
本周最热论坛帖子
2299 
43
