|
发表于 3-2-2025 06:52 AM
来自手机
|
显示全部楼层
JowY 发表于 2-2-2025 03:01 PM
除非國行捏造金流證據,不然不管 Zeti 講了什麽,沒講什麽,她有沒有幫忙納吉替1MDB洗錢並讓家人得益,都 ... iv. Credibility of prosecution witnesses
58. The thrust of the defence's submissions in respect of the credibility of certain prosecution witnesses is premised inter alia, upon the accused being an unwitting victim and scapegoat of the scheme formulated by these witnesses to defraud 1MDB behind the back of the accused and because of their self-serving and vested interests, are unworthy of belief.
59. Amhari Efendi (PW8) admitted that he received monies from Jho Low. Jasmine Loo (PW50) also admitted that she was given cash and gifts by Jho Low and that Jho Low gave her RM100 million between 2011 and 2014 as part of their JV to make investments.
60. Shahrol Azral (PW9) only received a salary and bonuses for his position in the company.
61. Tan Sri Dr Zeti Akhtar Aziz (PW43), a former Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) governor, was alleged to have had an ulterior motive to serve as her family members were also implicated.
62. Despite the allegations levelled against them, these witnesses were not accomplices and were candid about their acceptance of certain favours and gifts. In this regard, there is no legal presumption that an interested witness should not be believed.
63. I find the testimonies of these witnesses in relation to the role of the accused with regard to the charges proffered were consistent and it further constituted a common thread of evidence which was not coincidental with regard to the involvement of the accused and his relationship with Jho Low and other persons who were not called.
64. In the overall scheme of things, this court also finds that there ultimately would be no motive for these witnesses to testify and to frame up the accused who was at the time wielding enormous powers as the prime minister and finance minister.
65. Considering the evidence as a whole including the provisions of Articles 68,93 and 117 of the company’s Memorandum and Articles of Association (M&A), the accused stood at the apex of the decision-making process.
66. It would be tantamount to suicide for these witnesses to deliberately give evidence against the accused given the latter’s position at the time.
67. It is important to bear in mind that at the end of the day, these witnesses were not the ones on trial and notwithstanding the allegations against them, I find that their evidence in respect of the main facts in issue in the trial are capable of belief.
68. Therefore, upon a perusal and analysis of the evidence and based upon the demeanour of these witnesses, this court finds that despite the accusations levelled, the credibility of these witnesses remains intact with regard to the main facts in issue in this case.
69. The finding of this court in respect of the rest of the prosecution witnesses is that their credibility is also intact and capable of belief.
187. Tan Sri Zeti (PW48) said that the accused had asked her to declare that he had not committed any wrongdoing.
https://theedgemalaysia.com/node/732231
以上这些话是法官说的。你有种,就去怼法官。
|
|