八姑被控谋杀！

https://www.orientaldaily.com.my/news/society/2026/04/01/808069?source=hot-news





酒驾吸毒酿祸撞死摩哆骑士　28岁司机今被控谋杀罪恐面对死刑

（巴生1日讯）酒驾吸毒撞死摩哆骑士案，28岁被告今日在巴生推事庭被控谋杀罪与吸毒罪名，若罪成或面对绞刑！

根据控状指出，被告沙地甘纳帕迪于2026年3月29日早上约11时47分，在巴生大红花西路一带危险驾驶，导致摩哆骑士阿米鲁哈菲当场死亡。有关行为已抵触《刑事法典》第302条文（谋杀)。

一旦罪名成立，被告可被判处死刑；或监禁不少于30年、不超过40年，若未判死刑，亦须另加不少于12下鞭刑。此外，警方调查发现，被告在事发当天下午约3时30分，在巴生南区警区总部肃毒组接受检测时，被证实体内含有毒品成分，包括新型毒品“炸弹”（benzo）及大麻，抵触1952年危险毒品法令第15(1)(a)条文（吸毒)。

一旦罪成，可被判罚款不超过5000令吉，或监禁不超过两年，或两者兼施。

与此同时，法庭也可依据同一法令第38B条文，对被告施加不少于2年及不超过3年的监督令。

被告在通译员宣读完控状后表示明白控罪，惟推事庭无权判决谋杀案，因此没有认罪环节。

承审推事卡迪亚妮不批准被告保释，并将案件押后至6月3日过堂，以待化学、脱氧核糖核酸验测（DNA）及毒理报告提呈。

负责上述案件的主控官为娜迪雅副检察司，被告没有聘请代表律师。

这场夺命车祸是于上个月29日上午11时40分，发生在巴生皇城市政厅大厦后山的大红花西路路段。

一名20多岁的本地男子驾驶一辆本田轿车，当时疑为超越前方多辆轿车，驶入对面反方向车道，并与迎面而来的摩哆发生猛烈碰撞｡  

事故造成一名30多岁的本地摩哆骑士被撞飞，摔落在另一辆迈威轿车的车顶后，当场身亡。

警方随后对涉事司机进行检测，结果显示其体内含有酒精及毒品成分，该嫌犯随后也遭逮捕｡  

中文报不懂马塞克什么屁

叫狼

只是要给不满的人一个交代而已，都是在浪费时间。
告误杀比较实际

叫狼 发表于 2-4-2026 09:22 AM
只是要给不满的人一个交代而已，都是在浪费时间。
告误杀比较实际

的确， 锄不进的，这样提告！进到高庭应该会更改控状不然无罪释放就叼了！

ilovet

死者老婆说: "一命抵一命！"

l0ser

叫狼 发表于 2-4-2026 09:22 AM
只是要给不满的人一个交代而已，都是在浪费时间。
告误杀比较实际

我也是好奇为什么提控谋杀，动机的部分很难成立

虽然是悲剧，但借鉴以往的案例，刑罚大概率是监禁不超过15年、罚款不超过10万、吊销执照10年

无驾照吸毒女司机撞死人认罪判刑  监6年罚款逾万令吉
https://c.cari.com.my/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=4246299
(出处: 佳礼资讯网)

火仔

l0ser 发表于 2-4-2026 10:08 AM
我也是好奇为什么提控谋杀，动机的部分很难成立

虽然是悲剧，但借鉴以往的案例，刑罚大概率是监禁不超过 ...

表面功夫要做。

先控了再説。

使用者

嗯，要看法官怎么判。

叫狼

匿名者 发表于 2-4-2026 09:32 AM
的确， 锄不进的，这样提告！进到高庭应该会更改控状不然无罪释放就叼了！

...

证明给马来人看政府顺从民意

ilovet 发表于 2-4-2026 10:00 AM
死者老婆说: "一命抵一命！"

A drunk and drug-influenced driver who causes death faces a low to moderate likelihood of a murder conviction, although it is increasingly possible depending on the jurisdiction and the specific evidence of reckless intent. While commonly charged as manslaughter or dangerous driving, charging such cases as murder is rare but not impossible, especially if the behavior shows "implied malice" or an extreme, conscious disregard for human life



Here is a breakdown of the likelihood and factors:
1. Legal Threshold for Murder (High Burden of Proof)

• Intent: To convict for murder, the prosecution must usually prove "malice aforethought" (intent to kill) or, in some jurisdictions, "implied malice" (acting with a high, known risk of killing).
• Distinction from Manslaughter: Simple impaired driving causing death is often categorized as negligence (manslaughter). To reach a murder conviction, the prosecution must show the conduct was so reckless—such as speeding significantly, driving on the wrong side of the road, or ignoring traffic signals—that the driver knew they were likely to cause death
  

2. Factors Increasing the Likelihood of a Murder Conviction

• "Implied Malice": If a driver has prior DUI convictions, they may be aware of the fatal risks, making it easier to prove "implied intent" (often referred to as a Watson murder in some jurisdictions).
• Extremely Reckless Behavior: Examples include driving the wrong way, fleeing from police, or driving at extreme speeds while under the influence.
• Combination of Substances: Using multiple drugs or combining drugs and alcohol significantly increases the recklessness factor, often leading to harsher charges
• 3. Case Example: Malaysia 2026
  
  • In a recent high-profile case (April 2026) in Malaysia, a 28-year-old was charged with murder (Section 302 of the Penal Code) after a high-speed crash under the influence of drugs (benzodiazepines/THC) and alcohol, resulting in a fatality.
  • Verdict Outcome: The driver was charged under Section 302, which carries the death penalty or 30-40 years in prison, with the prosecutor pursuing a murder conviction rather than just a traffic offense, signaling a shift toward stricter treatment of such cases
    
  
  Summary
  While a murder conviction is challenging to obtain due to the high burden of proving intent, the rise of "implied malice" doctrines—treating the decision to drink/use drugs and drive as a conscious decision to risk death—means intoxicated drivers are increasingly being convicted of murder rather than lesser charges.
  
  

叫狼

l0ser 发表于 2-4-2026 10:08 AM
我也是好奇为什么提控谋杀，动机的部分很难成立

虽然是悲剧，但借鉴以往的案例，刑罚大概率是监禁不超过 ...

平息民众怒火之后再换去告误杀

叫狼

l0ser 发表于 2-4-2026 10:08 AM
我也是好奇为什么提控谋杀，动机的部分很难成立

虽然是悲剧，但借鉴以往的案例，刑罚大概率是监禁不超过 ...

谋杀跟赔 100 万这些都是不实际

tornado

车祸撞死人一般是被控过失杀人罪，

不过看视频这家伙是驾车直直猛撞，汽车没有闪避的意思，

这可能已经构成故意杀人罪（谋杀罪）~