|
|

楼主 |
发表于 5-9-2023 03:16 PM
|
显示全部楼层
找个喜欢讲政治的律师谈一谈,问他是否看了也比较了鸡鸡、扎西、马海丁的起诉控状?
第一和第二,名字、地点、银行户口、支票号码、数额都呈堂了,所以一个去Kajang,另一个是DNAA。
而马海丁的情况,
According to the charge sheet, Muhyiddin, who is also Pagoh MP, had allegedly, in his capacity as Bersatu president, illegally received RM5mil from Bukhary Equity Sdn Bhd at the Amcorp Mall, Petaling Jaya AmBank branch.
He is accused of receiving the money that was deposited into the Bersatu AmBank account on Jan 7 last year.
这种情况只有两个情况:马海丁确实是贪污和滥权了,可是主控官在调查时没仔细找出能将马海丁绳之于法的证据?或者说,这纯粹是在政治操作?
|
|