梁振英「恐嚇」澳媒 特首律師信曝光

BIZET

梁振英「恐嚇」澳媒　特首律師信曝光

                                                                                                                                                                                                                【本報訊】澳洲傳媒Fairfax Media踢爆特首梁振英秘密收受澳洲財團5,000萬港元巨款。為阻止報道出街，梁曾向澳媒發律師信施壓。澳洲記者John Garnaut昨公開律師信內容，梁在信中警告報道涉及誹謗，會令公眾誤以為梁是「不道德、不誠實的人」，要求澳媒在時限內回覆保證不會刊登報道。惟澳媒無懼「恐嚇」，直接將報道刊登。
負責這宗調查報道的澳洲記者John Garnaut，昨向本港多間傳媒公開梁振英的律師信文本。                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           強調與許仕仁涉貪案不同                                                                                                                                       
信中梁振英否認報道內的指控，更指如刊登報道，將令公眾對梁振英產生一系列錯覺，包括誤以為梁是「貪腐官員」、「不道德」、「不誠實」、「為了私利會作犧牲公眾利益的欺詐行為」及「不適合擔任公職」等，故已涉及誹謗；信中又特別提到，指梁的收款事件與許仕仁涉貪案不同，兩者不能相提並論。如Fairfax Media將報道刊登，梁振英將對該公司及負責記者採取法律行動。信中也限令澳媒要在一日後、即10月8日下午12時30分前回覆，保證不會刊登有關報道，惟澳媒不為所動，選擇在限期當日將報道刊登。

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20141011/18896525

第1 至5點其實就是香港特首的 衰野.
「貪腐官員」、
「不道德」、
「為了私利會作犧牲公眾利益的欺詐行為」、
「不誠實」及
「不適合擔任公職」

全中.

九九勇男

单凭一封外媒似是而非的信；就可将梁振英入罪？港民仿佛回到封建时期...那种“欲施以罪；何患無辞” 的年代。
能够理解港暴民的心理...经过这么一闹；中央政府采取更加严峻的措施；反正2017年普选已無望...再闹下去已没有什么意义...
反正港暴民也不敢上北京示威；特区首长变成代罪羔羊。

[九九勇男]

梁振英隨時可以移民 做不做特首都一樣

BIZET

https://www.youtube.com/watch?fe ... e&v=qzm3n-81pNE


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzm3n-81pNE&feature=youtu.be梁振英偷袋五千萬﹐涉瞞稅〈蕭遙遊〉2014-10-09 a  

BIZET

以梁振英為人特性, 此等視頻已收律師信, 不過到現在都未發生.
即係不言而諭. 心照啦.
做特首收秘撈, 收埋不道德的欺騙小股東款項5000萬.
大家諗吓啦.
人地俾得5000萬, 一定要你做相當利益回報. 倍數以上.

BIZET

俾你睇埋西報

Australian reporter warned by CY Leung’s office not to publish ‘totally wrong’ story

    Joyce Ng joyce.ng@scmp.com
          PUBLISHED : Friday, 10 October, 2014, 5:20pm

      One of the Australian journalists who broke the story on Leung Chun-ying’s controversial HK$50 million deal with Australian firm UGL has revealed that he received a warning from the chief executive’s office before the story was published.
In a letter dated October 7, Leung’s lawyer John Dalzell asked John Garnaut and Fairfax Media group counsel Gail Hambly to confirm by noon of October 8 that they “will not publish the intended article with those unfounded and libellous allegations”.
Fairfax Media runs the Sydney Morning Herald, which published the report on October 8.
In the letter, Dalzell said the allegations that the newspaper were planning to publish amounted to saying that the chief executive is “a corrupt public official, unethical, willing to engage in fraudulent activity at the public’s expense for his own gain, dishonest, and not a fit and proper person to hold public office”.
The newspaper report suggested that Leung had received HK$50 million from the Australian engineering firm UGL, six months before he became chief executive. UGL wanted to buy the insolvent property firm DTZ, of which Leung was a director. The agreement between Leung and UGL arose as a side deal from the acquisition.
The deal, made two days before Leung resigned from DTZ and the completion of the takeover, stipulated Leung would receive the money in two instalments in 2012 and 2013. UGL and Leung said the money was to prevent him from joining or forming a rival firm within two years.
But the deal also contained an “additional commitment” clause, by which Leung agreed to “[act] as a referee and an adviser from time to time” if asked. The clause raises questions about whether Leung could take up a paid advisory job for a commercial entity while serving as Hong Kong’s chief executive.

Pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong, which entered their thirteenth day on Friday, have focused much of their anger on Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying. Photo: AFP
In the lawyer’s letter, Dalzell also dismissed the reporters' comparison between Leung’s situation and the case of former Chief Secretary Rafael Hui as “totally wrong” and “unjustified”. Hui, who was the second most important official in Hong Kong, is currently on trial in a bribery case involving property tycoons Thomas and Raymond Kwok.
The chief executive’s office confirmed issuance of the letter last night, saying the allegations in the Fairfax report were “very serious” and Leung had decided that “the matter had to be taken very seriously”.
Garnaut said he disclosed the lawyer’s letter to the Hong Kong media “in the interests of transparency”. He added that the letter was understandable from Leung’s point of view, but it would not affect his newspaper’s plans.
He declined to reveal the source of the documents. “The [Hong Kong] journalists ask whether this was a conspiracy emanating from Beijing, to give President Xi an excuse to rid [himself] of an under-performing Hong Kong chief executive. Beijing asks if this was revenge for ICAC’s raids on Apple Daily publisher Jimmy Lai. Perhaps it all balances out into something less sensational.”
Garnaut added “I really don’t want to lead or mislead, our sources deserve to be protected, and we haven’t really got anything more to say. So I’ll leave it at that.”

http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-ko ... blish-totally-wrong