終結貪腐~32樓~推不倒的泰益王朝~170項疑似贪污/白象/豆腐工程/津贴/赔钱/军購/虧損

Sephiroth83

全部亿亿声...

panwood

在大马贪污文化，犹如合法行为，由80年代贪到如今，贪污腐败案例难以统计。。
独揽大权贪腐政客，括取数以亿计国家财物，贪官都有办法跳过法律执裁，
可能原因是政党长时间执政，操控国家三权大局，才促成贪污滥权没人被定罪。
看来让一个政党强大据位太久，贪污腐败仍然除不去。。

artcreator

记得08年那年也有类似这样的帖子，而且还有大量的善心网友和印刷厂免费印刷，还设有中巫英文三个版本，家家户户去派送。

沙巴仔

看到这些现当政者的贪污行为，把人民的血汗钱这样子的拼命刮，给他们停留
在位多一天都不行。。。。。

看一下Tony Pua 再爆出新贪污的案件， 真的顶他们这帮贪得无厌的王八。。。。。。。。

Subject: Another big scandal KLIA 2
         
One billion for Election fund (buy votes etc)
One billion for individuals' pockets
One billion to buy hand bags and diamonds
                                      
        Tony Pua read with shock on Air Asia Chief Executive Officer Tony Fernandes’ blog that the cost of the new KLIA2 “low-cost” airport has ballooned to a shocking RM5 billion.

        The initial budget for the airport when it was first announced by Dato’ Seri Ong Tee Keat, the then Transport Minister in July 2007 was only RM1.7 billion.  (Berita Harian 22 July 2007)

        The budget was subsequently increased to RM2.0 billion in March 2009 (The Star 10 March 2009), and then RM2.5 billion in October 2010 (Business Times 30 October 2010). At the end of last year, Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad (MAHB) shocked Malaysians by disclosing that the cost of the new airport has ballooned to RM3.9 billion due to cost overruns in November 2011.Hence the new estimated cost of KLIA2, RM5 billion is now nearly 300% above the original budget of RM1.7 billion.

        TONY PUA WRITES KLIA 2 - ANOTHER UMNO SCANDALI  has repeatedly called for the cost of KLIA2 to be investigated by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) as well as the Ministry ofTransport since last year.  However, the attempts to secure accountability over the massive scandal has been impeded by the lack of urgency in the PAC as well as the absolute disinterest by the Minister of Transport, Dato’ Seri Kong Cho Ha. Despite several promises to meet Pakatan Rakyat Members of Parliament over the issue since last year, Dato’ Seri Kong Cho Ha has failed to do so. I had requested for an explanation from his ministry over the issue, particularly over the reason for the shift of the airport from the originally proposed northern site (KLIA North) to the current western site (KLIA West) which is under construction. The shift of the site has caused the cost of construction to bloat because KLIA West was already identified as unsuitable for the construction of an airport due to it being a peat swamp.The result of the shift for example, has caused substantial increasein earthworks cost, which the Ministry of Transport claimed to cost RM773 million, but is believed by many parties in the industry to been even higher. However, despite the seriousness of the mismanagement of public funds, Dato’ Seri Kong Cho Ha has refused to provide any details in his parliamentary reply, and merely shrugged off the issue claiming that the decision to shift the site was “based on KLIA Blueprint December2008”. What is worse is the Minister’s complete lackadaisical attitude towards the brazen abuse of tax-payers’ funds.  The Transport Minister has responded earlier statements by saying that I was “playing politics” (Bernama) and was “barking up the wrong tree” (The Star). Dato’ Seri Kong said I “should direct questions about the construction of KLIA2 to Malaysia Airport Holdings Berhad (MAHB) instead of accusing him of trying to cover up.”  He had further added that he has “nothing to hide.  I'm not an airport engineer or consultant for the project and whatever the information I have about the project were given by MAHB.”

        In fact, at the rate the cost of KLIA2 is piling up, it will soon become a much bigger scandal than the Port Klang Free Zone project which cost increased from an initial RM1.1 billion to RM12.5 billion. In the interest of transparency and accountability, the Prime Minister must order a full public investigation into how the cost of the new “low cost” airport could be so inflated and ensure that all who are responsible for the RM5 billion fiasco be sacked from their office, including that of the Minister of Transport.

        SAY "NO" TO THE CORRUPT/WASTEFUL BN GOVT.

perahu

这个楼，在告诉网友，我国退休人士和在职者，所投资在基建公司和相关基金的钱是没有必要的。在楼主的眼中，基建公司是不应该存在于我国的。

s2143

perahu 发表于 24-1-2013 12:50 PM
这个楼，在告诉网友，我国退休人士和在职者，所投资在基建公司和相关基金的钱是没有必要的。在楼主的眼中， ...

不是没有必要 而是这些基建工程在投标过程没有经过公开招标
而是暗箱作业，
里面涉及大量不明金钱

aeroplane11

perahu 发表于 24-1-2013 12:50 PM
这个楼，在告诉网友，我国退休人士和在职者，所投资在基建公司和相关基金的钱是没有必要的。在楼主的眼中， ...

標題寫得很清楚 - 贪污/白象/豆腐工程/津贴/毁约赔钱/亏损/军购案列，這跟基建有什麽關係啊？基建只是佔少部分。

在我眼中，您還是趕快囘火星去吧。

panwood

perahu 发表于 24-1-2013 12:50 PM
这个楼，在告诉网友，我国退休人士和在职者，所投资在基建公司和相关基金的钱是没有必要的。在楼主的眼中， ...

让道你认为基建公司是非盈利机构？，资金来源究竟在高标下流失了多少？
退休人士与在职者的存款-或-政府管理的基金，政府虽然拥权去动用，不代表存款者会认同，
相信许多存款人会质疑，资金有没有被滥用了？在油水搬运途中被蒸发了多少？
这大部分爱国人民的疑虑，公开向政府控诉被当是叛乱。
民声不闻不理，只有在大选时跟滥权者来个了断。。

perahu

尽是捕风捉影的猜测。

公积金局投资，都是稳当和赚钱的。几乎国内最赚钱的行业都有他们的一份。


事实上，整个帖楼都是捕风捉影的多。

不要建啦，什么都不要建，亚洲运动会，共和联邦运动会，通通都叫外国选手去园丘比赛，住茅屋！

NBK1965

perahu 发表于 25-1-2013 07:16 AM
尽是捕风捉影的猜测。

公积金局投资，都是稳当和赚钱的。几乎国内最赚钱的行业都有他们的一份。

你可以当作看不到，人民看到就好。

perahu

雪州民联要耗掉储备金来建伊斯兰城，大约30亿令吉，华人没份。

perahu

很多大工程的付给，都是安华做财政部长时在做。在内阁决定大工程时，没有理由说这位副首相兼财政部长没有参与的。

猫猫拳

perahu 发表于 25-1-2013 07:16 AM
尽是捕风捉影的猜测。

公积金局投资，都是稳当和赚钱的。几乎国内最赚钱的行业都有他们的一份。

稳当及赚钱的？？
好像投资felda的股票那样？？
EPF=人民的血汗钱，政府的ATM

猫猫拳

perahu 发表于 25-1-2013 07:56 AM
雪州民联要耗掉储备金来建伊斯兰城，大约30亿令吉，华人没份。

请问所谓的伊斯兰城要建在哪里？
请给个link来看看
我看到的相关新闻只是雪州苏丹说要人要沙亚南改名成伊斯兰城
找不到要用30亿来建伊斯兰城
还是阿叔你有内部消息？

NBK1965

perahu 发表于 25-1-2013 10:04 AM
很多大工程的付给，都是安华做财政部长时在做。在内阁决定大工程时，没有理由说这位副首相兼财政部长没有参 ...

你是说国阵没有发展，只有在安华时期才有，莫怪安华时期有盈余，其他时期都是亏损，因为国阵只顾贪污，没有发展。

panwood

记的有一年温家宝到访马六甲，问我国要建大桥横渡马六甲海峡，要耗多少钱？
我们的领袖看似数学装才，当场就能串出天文数字回应，温家宝听后只是宛然一笑。。
可能还没觉悟，人家脸在笑-心里也偷笑。。

I_AM_Ah_LIANG

总司令 发表于 19-6-2010 12:55 AM
雙峰塔

建成：1998

双峰塔是1.6,哪有2.5那么多。。。。。。

perahu

林吉祥数十年反对mega project, 现在林冠英用5年时间囤积了一大笔钱，要连同前政府累积的储备金，拿来建隧道和交通疏通系统，林吉祥就不反对了。

bkk123

perahu 发表于 28-1-2013 01:42 PM
林吉祥数十年反对mega project, 现在林冠英用5年时间囤积了一大笔钱，要连同前政府累积的储备金，拿来建隧道 ...

个人觉得疏通槟城的交通项目是必须的
而建立什么warisan大厦就没必要了！

perahu

308前把自己讲到很厉害，结果槟城人塞了5年。

现在他说要拿六十多亿才办得到。


我们应该给回民政做，六十多亿喔，是猪都做得来啦！自己不用动手的，给钱就可以了！