有谁读过《念力的秘密》这本书？ 我把书贴上来了~

大界王神

素还真 发表于 25-1-2013 02:07 PM
体，用之说是出自儒家和道家。这是古中国人的思想和佛教无关。

至于秘密，我已经删去，后悔打出来。秘 ...

虽说体，用之说是出自儒家和道家，但是本质上佛法也分体用，如无为法为体，有为法为用。

素兄，你这样吊人家胃口，不steady叻。。。

素还真

大界王神 发表于 25-1-2013 02:21 PM
虽说体，用之说是出自儒家和道家，但是本质上佛法也分体用，如无为法为体，有为法为用。[/ba ...

吊人胃口是我不对，抱歉。

以无为法为体，有为法为用，恕我不能认同。

大界王神

素还真 发表于 25-1-2013 02:28 PM
吊人胃口是我不对，抱歉。

以无为法为体，有为法为用，恕我不能认同。

无所谓, 如人饮水, 冷暖自知

素还真

大界王神 发表于 25-1-2013 02:53 PM
无所谓, 如人饮水, 冷暖自知

这句名言被用了多次，不能成为识得佛法的凭据。好了，我相信我们再谈下去也没有结果。

大界王神

素还真 发表于 25-1-2013 02:57 PM
这句名言被用了多次，不能成为识得佛法的凭据。好了，我相信我们再谈下去也没有结果。

佛陀八万四千法门, 各人各自修行必然各有体验, 不必强求认同

尽善尽美

大界王神 发表于 25-1-2013 11:31 AM
Science without religion is lame, Religion without Science is blind     -Albert Einstein

佛法和 ...

In addition to fake quotes, be on the lookout for quotes taken out of context, especially with regards to religion. Einstein could be described as a deist, but was absolutely not a theist, except in his boyhood. This one's a real quotation:

science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind

but the full context is

Even though the realms of religion and science in themselves are clearly marked off from each other, nevertheless there exist between the two strong reciprocal relationships and dependencies. Though religion may be that which determines the goal, it has, nevertheless, learned from science, in the broadest sense, what means will contribute to the attainment of the goals it has set up. But science can only be created by those who are thoroughly imbued with the aspiration toward truth and understanding. This source of feeling, however, springs from the sphere of religion. To this there also belongs the faith in the possibility that the regulations valid for the world of existence are rational, that is, comprehensible to reason. I cannot conceive of a genuine scientist without that profound faith. The situation may be expressed by an image: science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.

Though I have asserted above that in truth a legitimate conflict between religion and science cannot exist, I must nevertheless qualify this assertion once again on an essential point, with reference to the actual content of historical religions. This qualification has to do with the concept of God. During the youthful period of mankind's spiritual evolution human fantasy created gods in man's own image, who, by the operations of their will were supposed to determine, or at any rate to influence, the phenomenal world. Man sought to alter the disposition of these gods in his own favor by means of magic and prayer. The idea of God in the religions taught at present is a sublimation of that old concept of the gods. Its anthropomorphic character is shown, for instance, by the fact that men appeal to the Divine Being in prayers and plead for the fulfillment of their wishes.

As you can see, Einstein was not using "religion" to mean any of the mainstream organized religions. (Personally I find it difficult to see what exactly he did mean by it, or why he chose to use that word, but that's another question.)

http://www.quora.com/Albert-Eins ... is-How-can-you-tell
再说爱因斯坦一个人可代表不了科学界