【PR问题疑难区】

stephy07

我现要申请PR，但是我没三年的CPF STATEMENT（在这工作不到半年），请问可以只呈交一年的吗（也就是／也只有去年的）？

inside

原帖由 stephy07 于 16-3-2008 06:47 PM 发表
我现要申请PR，但是我没三年的CPF STATEMENT（在这工作不到半年），请问可以只呈交一年的吗（也就是／也只有去年的）？

可以申请的。。记得把所有的工资单要带好/复印好。。

prataboy

我PR四年多了，re-entry permit是五年的。。。。re-entry是今年九月expires.....如果我要renew，最快几时可以去renew？ renew的话是多少年？五年？十年？还有renew re-enty permit的procedure是怎么样的？要给什么文件等等？

sotong是我

想问transfer rep需要什么doc吗?
大概需要多久时间?

AhJuin

原帖由 sotong是我 于 17-3-2008 12:45 PM 发表
想问transfer rep需要什么doc吗?
大概需要多久时间?

http://app.ica.gov.sg/serv_pr/per_res/app_for_rep_faq.asp#q1

How do I transfer a valid REP/Visa?
A valid REP/Visa can be transferred from an expired travel document to a valid travel document. However, the travel document must belong to the same person and the REP/Visa can only be transferred to the same type of travel document.


What are the documents required for the transfer?
You should produce your new and expired travel documents to the Permanent Resident Services Centre, 5th Storey, ICA Building.

Must the applicant be present at the time of submission for transfer?
The applicant need not be present at the time of submission unless required to do so by a REP/CI officer.

What is the fee charged for the transfer?
Applicants do not have to pay for the transfer.

What is the processing time for the transfer?
The processing time for the transfer is about 30 minutes.

michael345

请问各位大大？？
拿到IC后要自己去申请CPF ACCOUNT的吗？

Aiai1982

原帖由 michael345 于 18-3-2008 11:51 AM 发表
请问各位大大？？
拿到IC后要自己去申请CPF ACCOUNT的吗？

你的公司会帮你申的。。。

inside

原帖由 Aiai1982 于 18-3-2008 12:02 PM 发表


你的公司会帮你申的。。。

公司自动申报的？需要我们的签名吗？那天去交IC忘了问。。

那么几时开始扣CPF啊？

Aiai1982

原帖由 inside 于 18-3-2008 09:53 PM 发表


公司自动申报的？需要我们的签名吗？那天去交IC忘了问。。

那么几时开始扣CPF啊？

当初我是公司帮我申报而且我也没有签名。。。

我的是拿到IC那个月就开始扣CPF了。。。

但不懂其它公司是几时开始扣。。。

心之永恒

我想问如果已经在马来西亚注册结婚，现在已经是新加坡pr。还需要在新加坡注册吗？

mosquitomunn

pr 好吗？我考虑了很久石否要apply

因为怕cpf被扣住在这里
因为我可能不会在这里呆很久
应该只是2-3年吧

bursamalaysia

PR applicants don't need employers to sponsor them

Print This Page

Email This Page

The Straits Times (27 Jun 06): Can firms bond their workers to get PR?
The Straits Times (29 Jun 06): Trap in PR Applications
MOM (07 Jul 06): PR aplicants don't need employers to sponsor them.

Can firms bond their workers to get PR?
- The Straits Times, 27 June 2006
I encountered recently a few cases of my foreign friends who are employed as professionals in Singapore in private firms where they are 'bonded' with a three-year (or more) contract with companies in exchange for permanent residence application. The companies 'sponsor' the employees. The employee who breaches the contract would have to pay the company a certain amount of money, which varies from three months' to six months' pay.
I was surprised that companies are allowed such a practice. Is this legal? Does the Ministry of Manpower allow employers to bind the employees in such a contract?
In our country's immigration policies, I believe permanent residence status is based on the applicants' merits and factors such as qualifications, type of profession etc, and that the companies support the applications by hiring them. Our immigration system is supposed to grant permanent residence to those who can contribute to our economy.
Permanent residence is to give them the freedom to integrate in our society in terms of changing jobs, purchasing a home, putting their kids in our schools etc, as they become a part of our multiracial culture.
How do we encourage and invite foreign talents if we have such a practice as 'bond'? How will they continue to support our country's economy if they're 'bonded' in one particular job and company when they can have a better job with better pay in another? What if they have to remain bonded even when they're unhappy with the company? This will affect productivity.
It's understandable that employers want to protect their interests in case of high staff turnover and prevent the employees from resigning when they get permanent residence. But I am sure there are other ways to deal with this problem rather than binding them in such an unreasonable manner.
The Ministry of Manpower can educate employers. If this practice is illegal, it can impose a fine on those who breach the rules.But if the current practice is legal, there should be a review so that those with permanent residence can breathe more easily. We want everyone living in our country to be not only comfortable and making their contributions but also be happy in doing so.

Trap in PR Applications
- The Straits Times, 29 June 2006
The grant of permanent residence to foreigners is a critical component of Singapore's human-capital formation and its replenishment. It is a privilege that recognises demonstrated contributions to society and the economy. A violinist with symphony-orchestra credentials has equal claim to value as a geneticist and a language specialist. With the birth rate languishing at slightly above half of the 2.1 replacement level, immigration assumes growing importance as a demographic and manpower planning tool. Latest available figures bear out the quickening pace: 290,118 permanent residents were recorded in the 2000 population census, a huge jump on the 112,132 in the 1990 count.
Any impediment to the smooth operation of the PR application process should be put right. If there is a hint some employers are imposing unreasonable restraint and conditions on employees seeking PR, it should be verified how widespread the habit is. It would amount to obstruction of state policy if it is. A letter to our Forum page on Tuesday describes a practice of employers that is questionable. Bosses tell foreign staff they will support their PR applications only if they signed an employment contract, typically of three years, according to the correspondent. If an employee declines, presumably on grounds such as low pay, lack of a career path or an exploitative workplace, a probable deserving case may abandon any thought of settling here. If he signs up against his better judgment, he will feel unjustly 'bonded' if he is confident he could have a better career with another firm. Just how many are deterred from applying through this form of manipulation is anybody's guess.
An employer in such an instance is misleading his employee. This is highly objectionable. An application requires an employer only to provide company details and to certify on a form that the applicant works for the firm. It is not sponsorship or in any way in support of the application. Companies which claim otherwise are being untruthful. Applicants could seek recourse with the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA), and it is understood a written explanation would in many cases be acceptable. If the ICA ascertains that the abuse is serious enough to harm the state's PR objectives, it could consider substituting authentication of employee status with a simpler step to close the loophole to dishonest employers.

MOM: PR aplicants don't need employers to sponsor them.
- Straits Times, 07 July 2006
Please refer to the letter "Can firms bond their workers to get PR?" (ST, 27 Jun) by Cera Amir and the subsequent editorial "Trap in PR Applications" (ST, 29 Jun).
2. Employers are not required to 'sponsor' an employee's application for PR. They need only certify that the employee is working for the firm. In lieu of the employer's certification, ICA will also allow the applicant to provide other documents that verify employment, such as payslips issued by the company. Thus far, the majority of PR applicants have had no problems getting such information from their employers.
3. Singapore welcomes all bona fide visitors seeking to work, study or stay here. Foreigners working in Singapore and holding a valid P, Q or S work pass are welcome to submit their applications for PR under the Professionals/Technical Personnel and Skilled Workers scheme. Each application for PR is assessed and considered on its own merits. They do not need their employers to sponsor them.

心之永恒

原帖由 心之永恒 于 20-3-2008 02:21 PM 发表
我想问如果已经在马来西亚注册结婚，现在已经是新加坡pr。还需要在新加坡注册吗？

没人知道吗？

Aiai1982

原帖由 心之永恒 于 20-3-2008 02:21 PM 发表
我想问如果已经在马来西亚注册结婚，现在已经是新加坡pr。还需要在新加坡注册吗？

我们是也在马来西亚注册结婚后才拿到pr。。
但我们没有在新加坡再注册。。

pctoh

我是EP Holder,工作四个月了，想在下个月申请成为PR,如果公司不肯帮我签表格，是不是就申请不到了？（我每个月的薪水，公司都是开支票的，没有Payslip。。整间公司雇员都是领支票的）

星星太阳月亮

原帖由 pctoh 于 25-3-2008 09:59 PM 发表
我是EP Holder,工作四个月了，想在下个月申请成为PR,如果公司不肯帮我签表格，是不是就申请不到了？（我每个月的薪水，公司都是开支票的，没有Payslip。。整间公司雇员都是领支票的）

pr可以自己申请，要写封declare信
没有payslip的话，可能可以print银行簿子  或者bank statement
我不肯定的，是突然想到的
怕的话可以去问问其他人
有些人也是没有payslip照去申请，跟他们讲你没有lo..

AhJuin

我是没有payslip的, 你可以叫做賬的复印支票票根或支票流向記录(有注明支票付給誰/用途)之類的文件證明. 現在太多人申請, 條規需求可能越來越得follow了...

j223

想请问一下,在申请PR的时候想换工作，会影响PR的申请吗?

EDD!E

原帖由 pctoh 于 25-3-2008 09:59 PM 发表
我是EP Holder,工作四个月了，想在下个月申请成为PR,如果公司不肯帮我签表格，是不是就申请不到了？（我每个月的薪水，公司都是开支票的，没有Payslip。。整间公司雇员都是领支票的）

试一试没有亏本的。

被reject就打电话问SIR为什么，第二次不就知道怎么做咯。

EDD!E

原帖由 j223 于 28-3-2008 09:04 PM 发表
想请问一下,在申请PR的时候想换工作，会影响PR的申请吗?

最好是 Blue IC 到手后才换工。