|
tan81个人专区2--季度检讨--红红的09年1Q(48页)謝絕灌水
[复制链接]
|
|
发表于 19-4-2009 06:10 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 19-4-2009 07:57 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 19-4-2009 08:09 PM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 1054# ThermoFisher 的帖子
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 19-4-2009 11:15 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 19-4-2009 11:27 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 20-4-2009 12:58 AM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 1057# tan81 的帖子
看来我们的看法和领悟相当一致。
呵呵,那就祝你投资顺利了。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 20-4-2009 01:44 AM
|
显示全部楼层
性格決定了你的投資,投資是和你的性格息息相關的。
你可以改變自己的性格嗎?
好像很難是嗎?
p/s 只要適合你的性格的投資不是可以囉。
暫時失敗並不代表永遠,人總是要經過風風浪浪的。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 20-4-2009 11:51 PM
|
显示全部楼层
Leading economic indicators dip more than expected
Private research group's monthly economic forecast fell slightly more than expected in March
* Tali Arbel, AP Business Writer
* Monday April 20, 2009, 10:55 am EDT
*
Buzz up!
* Print
NEW YORK (AP) -- A private sector group's index of leading economic indicators fell more than expected in March, but the forecast called for the recession's intensity to ease this summer.
The Conference Board said Monday that its monthly forecast of economic activity fell 0.3 percent in March and has not risen in nine months. Economists surveyed by Thomson Reuters expected a 0.2 percent decline.
The index is designed to forecast economic activity in the next three to six months based on 10 components, such as stock prices, the money supply, jobless claims, new orders by manufacturers and building permits.
The index for February was better than previously reported, falling 0.2 percent instead of 0.4 percent. But it was revised lower in January to a 0.2 percent decline, instead of a 0.1 percent increase.
"The recession may continue through summer, but the intensity will ease," Ken Goldstein, economist at the Conference Board, said in a release. "There have been some intermittent signs of improvement in the economy in April, but the leading economic index and most of its components are still pointing down."
Dragging the index lower were building permits, stock prices and vendors' deliveries to businesses.
But there were three positive indicators in March, including growth in the real money supply from Federal Reserve programs to pump up the economy. Also pointing higher were the wide "interest rate spread," or difference between the interest rates for 10-year Treasurys and the benchmark federal funds rate, and the consumer expectations index.
In the six months through March, the index fell 2.5 percent, nearly double the 1.4 percent drop in the six-month span through February.
In spring, however, there has been some positive news. The Dow Jones industrials rose about 15 percent since their February bottom.
Auto sales in March jumped 25 percent from the month before, construction of new homes seems to have stabilized, and earnings from big banks have been better than expected. Bank of America Corp. on Monday became the latest to report a profit that beat analysts' expectations -- even as it put up $6.4 billion to cover future credit losses.
The National Association for Business Economics' latest quarterly survey, also out Monday, showed that while companies and trade associates are more pessimistic about U.S. economic growth, more companies are seeing increased demand for their products. There also was a slight uptick in businesses reporting increased capital spending, but more than half still said they were cutting back, according to the NABE report.
Still, the labor market likely will stay weak and more claims for unemployment insurance helped drag down the Conference Board index.
The Labor Department said last week that while new jobless claims were at the lowest level since late January, people continuing to collect unemployment insurance rose above 6 million for the first time.
Many economists expect the unemployment rate -- now at a 25-year high of 8.5 percent -- to hit 10 percent by the end of the year.
On Monday, a General Motors Corp. executive said 1,600 white-collar workers will lose their jobs in the next few days as the struggling automaker chops away at the 47,000 worldwide layoffs set to happen this year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 1-5-2009 12:23 AM
|
显示全部楼层
恶魔开始出来害人了。和Cari 的一群人很像。
Dow 10,000 By Year's End? Some Pros Think It's Possible
* On Thursday April 30, 2009, 10:01 am EDT
*
Buzz up!
* Print
After months of being fed doomsday scenarios, investors are now starting to take a look at stock market utopia.
In this land, bad news, like
Wednesday's dismal GDP numbers
, don't matter.
Here, housing prices stabilize, banks are resuscitated, corporations offer positive earnings guidance, and economic data points start showing signs that things are actually improving and aren't just less horrible than before.
A total fantasy land? Maybe not, say some experts who believe the market's best-case scenario isn't too shabby.
"I'm very impressed at how strong the market has been in the past several days. We've had every opportunity to sell off," says David Twibell, president of wealth management for Colorado Capital Bank in Denver. "Objectively, you've got to be somewhat surprised by that and certainly impressed.
"Are we really seeing a bottom in the market or a substantial bear market rally?" he adds. "This looks more and more like there are some real legs to this thing."
'Green Shoots' or Just Weeds?
In the case that the so-called "green shoots" of the economy-as delineated by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke-are real, then so are the realities that accompany the mild improvements in some areas.
One of the starkest is that anyone who thinks this market will see its historic highs from October 2007 anytime soon is dreaming.
"Are we going to get back to 14,000 on the Dow this year? That is highly, highly, highly unlikely," says John Buckingham, chief investment officer at value-based Al Frank Asset Management in Laguna Beach, Calif. "But you have to be realistic. If stocks doubled in the next five years, that's a phenomenal return from here."
Most experts interviewed by CNBC.com indicated that the Dow's best hope would be about 10,000 by year's end. Goldman Sachs, meanwhile, is among those that have set a 1,000 target for the broader Standard & Poor's 500 index.
Even then, such a move higher would reflect a 30 percent growth and come only under the most ideal conditions: Unemployment turning around, housing finally finding a bottom, a more positive earnings climate beyond the better-than-Armageddon results from the first quarter, and general signs of positivity from the economy in terms of production, inventory reduction and other key metrics.
Still, with the market in an historically volatile environment, don't bet against it.
"The best you might hope is to see some stability in the banking system, a re-emergence of risk-taking, in such a scenario," Buckingham says. "I've been through more than a few downturns and subsequent recoveries. What I've been surprised is by the magnitude of moves in both directions."
Too Much, Too Soon?
Indeed, the market has been rocked numerous times over the past 18 months by massive swings in both directions.
Some market pros are losing sleep over the notion that the optimism sweeping the market now could be setting Wall Street up for a fall.
"My underlying concern is I believe the market is going to rise ahead of the fundamentals. Anytime it does that the fundamentals have to catch up," says Michael Kresh, president of M.D. Kresh Financial Services in Islandia, N.Y. "I really don't want it to get too far ahead of where it is, because the snapback could change the public sentiment."
The prevailing hope, then, is that the market moves higher but in a controlled and sustainable fashion.
The baseline notions for the best-case scenarios remain the ideal. But a market that remains controlled by emotions is susceptible to sharp pullbacks.
Yet market-watchers have been encouraged by the drop in the Chicago Board Options Exchnage's Volatility Index (Chicago: VIX), which has fallen by more than half from its historic high.
"I would rather we kind of grind along here and make a couple-percent move week after week as opposed to what we saw last October, with a 10 percent up-day followed by a bunch of 3 or 4 percent down days," Buckingham says. "You want this to be a wave that's building as opposed to a giant tsunami."
At the end of the day, those looking for that gradual build may get what they want, while those hoping for a Wall Street Garden of Eden will have to wait until 2010 or beyond.
After all, unemployment is forecast to hit 10 percent or more, housing may not reach a true bottom for another six months, and earnings guidance from this quarter offered only scant opportunities for hopes of the best-case scenario materializing.
"My guess would be we're halfway to that point at this stage, maybe even less than halfway," says Richard Sparks, senior analyst at Schaeffer's Investment Research in Cincinnati. "You could argue the market's shaking off what should be bad news, but there's no clear evidence the economy is back on track." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 1-5-2009 12:46 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-5-2009 10:09 AM
|
显示全部楼层
shell 大起, 你的女友爽死了  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 4-5-2009 10:34 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 4-5-2009 08:22 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 tan81 于 10-3-2009 11:46 PM 发表 
今天适逢PBB 大跌,成功买进PBB。
在这里Update 我的Nestle 投资组合:
Cash: 89.87%
Nestle 股票: 5.78% 买价都是RM26。
PBB 股票: 4.35% 买价都是RM7.25。
今天卖出所有的PBB-01。 卖价是RM 8.60。
第一次通过Panic Selling 获利。虽然在之前离开大马时,失去了扩大获利的机会,不过获得很宝贵的经验。
实在感谢鱼大的教导,赚到的这笔钱。
收到了Statement ,才Update 组合的实际情况。Nestle 的股价上涨,也许占了组合的6% 左右。
现金应该是94%。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-5-2009 08:33 PM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 1065# tan81 的帖子
你的NESTLE赚很多了。。。。
我的平均价高你很多。。。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-5-2009 08:34 PM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 1065# tan81 的帖子
你的NESTLE赚很多了。。。。
我的平均价高你很多。。。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-5-2009 08:34 PM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 1065# tan81 的帖子
你的NESTLE赚很多了。。。。
我的平均价高你很多。。。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-5-2009 08:46 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

楼主 |
发表于 4-5-2009 08:54 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-5-2009 09:12 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 5-5-2009 08:36 AM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 1066# tan81 的帖子
敢问陈总是不是不看好后市?为什么持有这么多现金都不入场? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
本周最热论坛帖子
|