唉（哀悼为国捐躯的军警们）

大肚皮豚

有没有看见我的飞机?我看不见

sherlock_fai

cellowei 发表于 20-2-2013 12:14 PM
不知道怎么我加不到分。。。。
不能给你人气。。。

不用紧啦
开心就好

沙巴仔

sherlock_fai 发表于 20-2-2013 11:06 AM
sahabat地区基本上是在拿笃郊外的区。
基本上是FELDA垦殖区来的，油棕园。

Sahabat地区确实的地点是在我沙巴狗头型的上唇中间部分，上唇尖部分
叫Tanbisan, 整个狗头上唇Tanbisan附近到东谷地区大约六十几万公顷
在夏里斯做首席部长时就送来给联邦做FELDA。夏里斯个人得到联邦
什么好处我们沙巴汉就不知道咯。。。。

而Tanbisan听说早在几十年前就住大量的菲南苏洛人，跟菲南地区没
差别，早期那些去那边一带打猎，钓鱼的爱好者看了很平常，因为
州政府已管不到那边了。。。。

后来FELDA发展到那边，联邦政府看了也怕怕，听说后来有派驻一些
兵员在那边，还做了一个小型机场在那边呢。。。。

其他我再打电话去拿篤请教叔辈后再贴上来和大家分享。。。。。

希望这里这个不讲理的斑竹不要再删我的贴哦。。。。






。

alexsuen

sherlock_fai 发表于 20-2-2013 11:06 AM
sahabat地区基本上是在拿笃郊外的区。
基本上是FELDA垦殖区来的，油棕园。

其实垦殖区和垦殖民是什么意思？
加分

sherlock_fai

alexsuen 发表于 20-2-2013 01:26 PM
其实垦殖区和垦殖民是什么意思？
加分

垦殖区是垦殖民住的地区
垦殖区里居住的人叫垦殖民

alexsuen

sherlock_fai 发表于 20-2-2013 01:31 PM
垦殖区是垦殖民住的地区
垦殖区里居住的人叫垦殖民

所以垦殖区是什么?

sherlock_fai

alexsuen 发表于 20-2-2013 01:33 PM
所以垦殖区是什么?

垦殖民居住的地区
可以参考这里：
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colony

据我有限的知识，垦殖民是指那些在垦殖区里进行农业工作的的居民。

alexsuen

sherlock_fai 发表于 20-2-2013 01:38 PM
垦殖民居住的地区
可以参考这里：
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colony

那垦殖是什么意思？
开垦后殖民掉它？
999牙兰属于谁？

sherlock_fai

alexsuen 发表于 20-2-2013 01:40 PM
那垦殖是什么意思？
开垦后殖民掉它？
999牙兰属于谁？

基本上是这样吧
999雅兰属于集团所有吧


来，不要离题了

alexsuen

sherlock_fai 发表于 20-2-2013 01:44 PM
基本上是这样吧
999雅兰属于集团所有吧

就是讲那块地其实是"联邦直辖区”啦？

沙巴仔

alexsuen 发表于 20-2-2013 01:26 PM
其实垦殖区和垦殖民是什么意思？
加分

垦殖区和垦殖民其实听说在60，70 年代拿篤segama住的杜顺族不知真正什么
原因大量被移殖去靠近现在的FELDA的Silabukan去，每户人家好像给那边
土地一块和建一间小木屋给去那边人家。。。。。

听说当时那些杜顺族在segama住了几代要他们搬离很多反对不要搬，
后来当局给当时其族人首领不知什么好处，在他的劝说下才花了
多年才移殖到现在silabukan。。。。。



。。。

cellowei

蝙蝠俠貓頭鷹 发表于 20-2-2013 12:23 PM
今天在“加分” 坏了。 我也加不了

就是咯。。。。 我反复check了很多次都不可以。。

cellowei

大肚皮豚 发表于 20-2-2013 12:53 PM
有没有看见我的飞机?我看不见

看不到照片呀！！！！

沙巴仔

大肚皮豚 发表于 20-2-2013 12:00 PM
今天有特别的飞机来

这种是美国60年代的小型运输机C130， 在纳闽很常看到的。。。。

在纳闽机场看他们起飞时还会“咳嗽”，然后发动机喷黑烟，我看是
要退休了咯。。。




。

$波盘王$

haute3 发表于 20-2-2013 02:05 AM
不再回来了？

会呀，有认识到新朋友.

大肚皮豚

沙巴仔 发表于 20-2-2013 02:36 PM
这种是美国60年代的小型运输机C130， 在纳闽很常看到的。。。。

在纳闽机场看他们起飞时还会“咳 ...

原来，难怪我看它在机场走来走去，不懂在做么。好像练习开机

aquarius@

刚收到朋友的email。放上来给大家参考参考。

Subject: LD Standoff


Datuk Dr. Jeffrey Kitingan, Chairman STAR


The State Reform Party suspects that the Barisan Nasional government is trying to gain political mileage from the Lahad Datu standoff, using it to scare the people into voting for the BN in the coming general elections.


“It is even possible that this is an elaborate BN military strategy choreographed to achieve that purpose,” its state chairman, Datuk Dr. Jeffrey Kitingan said in a statement. “This new form of fear mongering makes sense knowing BN’s desperation in wanting to hold on to power in the light of the ruling coalition’s lowest level of popularity and support at the moment.”


He said the way the tense situation is handled supports this theory, pointing out to the fact that the Prime Minister appears to be not perturbed by the incident and had not made much effort in explaining the real situation in Lahad Datu in spite of the many inconsistencies on the information received by the people.


“The numerous rumours of disturbances like in KK and other areas spreading through social networks like Facebook add credence to the theory of the intrusion being orchestrated to frighten the people of Sabah.


“There are international reports which says the Sulu Sultan recognized by Manila had denied any involvement in the intrusion into Sabah, or that they are his army, while another sultan claims Lahad Datu to be his homeland and he and his people refuse to leave. The news had become an international intrigue while we in Sabah are still being denied the truth.


“The federal government has failed to show real seriousness and muscle in dealing with such a problem and we are becoming a laughing stock under the scrutiny of international observation,” Jeffrey claimed.


“We are talking of an intrusion by military units in full gear and weapons like M-16, the deadliest gun in army warfare.


Why can’t they treat this as a flagrant criminal act, a breach of national security and a violation of Malaysian sovereignty?


“It is shocking that the government has failed to deal with this security issue effectively and quickly by taking the appropriate measures on the intruders. What the government had done is take unconvincing action such as negotiating. By negotiating the government is giving a lot of legitimacy to the intruders as if they have some sort of rights when in fact they have none whatsoever to negotiate for in the first place.”


“By the successful act of intrusion into Lahad Datu, it shows total failure of Malaysia’s security apparatus. The government must explain where were the navy, marine police and its security patrols? Where were the national military intelligence and tip-off of the impending intrusion or invasion so it could be pre-empted? On the other hand if it is not a real intrusion, the failings of the security apparatus shows that it is indeed an orchestrated show and drama because the other components of a real invasion are missing!


“We can see that the response of the government is appalling and pathetic. The army, navy and the whole security apparatus with helicopters, tanks and heavy artillery should have been called in. Instead, negotiations are carried out by the police on the so-called no-bloodshed basis. What it was they negotiated about, and why had the negotiation taken so long? How come it is the police doing the negotiating and why was the army excluded? Are the police equipped to deal with the militants who are not normal criminals?


“It’s not amusing that the story is unfolding to portray the heroic acts of the intruders instead and making the police and army look weak and indecisive.


“We haven’t heard any report of the police demanding that they lay down their arms. Why? Is it because the whole thing is really a scripted dramatic charade to frighten the voters? If that is the game, it is a double-edged sword because it can backfire and cause the people to vote against the BN for the obvious failure in flexing military muscle for the sake of national dignity and sovereignty.


“Another fact that supports the theory this is a fear mongering tactic is that there is little media coverage in the government-controlled mass and mainstream media although the intrusion is bordering on an act of war. Isn't Sabah important enough as Malaysians to deserve being kept posted on the developments on the standoff? Why leave to private news and internet portals to carry news about it? Why is there so much rumours of disturbances in other areas in Sabah but the police is not taking action on the rumour mongers. Is it because this spreading of rumours is being fired up by cybertroopers?


“The government has proven itself to be not serious about Sabah's security. If the government can prevent an Australian senator from coming into KL, there is no reason the government cannot stop an intrusion by armed militants into Sabah.


In sum, the government has clearly failed to give us confidence in our security capability or to give us pride as Malaysians in dealing with an international incidence which has now tarnished our international reputation.


“If the government cannot protect our country and deal with this problem in a way that will enhance our standing as a sovereign nation, maybe it’s time for Malaysia to ask for international intervention,” Jeffrey said.

蝙蝠俠貓頭鷹

無用的政府！！！ 婆婆媽媽。。。
拖越久就越可疑

Jibgor

我是西马人，父母目前在 semborna 旅行,应该叫他们回来吗？我们家人都很担心

alexsuen

不要讲西马人不了解沙巴
沙巴人都不是很了解境内的垦殖区