【三叔旗艦機 Galaxy S III I9300】分享討論專區 - 是時候讓位給 S4 了！

kukubond007

随他们去咯. 我倒喜欢看人家后悔的心情.      当然不是指不买S3就会后悔,我是指,只因为一 ...
实与虚 发表于 12-5-2012 12:24 AM

其实我觉得S3外形不差，One X不是讲到那么美，论外形两个都是Abang Adik。。。
如果one x和one s的外形和处理器对调，我立刻买One X，One S design美啊！
弄到那么薄，做么不可以拆盖换电池，倒不如加1mm厚度可以换电池和电池容量加大，太薄没什么意义，只要控制在10mm以内的厚度其实很足够。这方面我很欣赏Motorola Razr Maxx的3300mah电池和9.9mm厚度

ben小喇叭

回复 697# 4561336


   啊？几时几时？快点 ！！！！！

ben小喇叭

回复 702# 实与虚


   完全同意！

kukubond007

不懂楼上几位朋友有有没有这个感觉。。。
刚开始看S3时，哗。。。好像很怪
但是看了Gsmanera和官网不同角度的照片后，又觉得几好看下，越看越顺眼，希望实机不会令我失望

4561336

回复  4561336


   啊？几时几时？快点 ！！！！！
ben小喇叭 发表于 12-5-2012 08:42 AM

她不要说，看来她是 S3 发表会的其中一个 freelance

ben小喇叭

回复 706# kukubond007


   我第一眼看不会觉得很怪，这种圆润性的之前GALAXY NEXUS也差不多一样

ben小喇叭

回复 708# 4561336


   希望你朋友可以再有多一点的消息

4561336

回复  4561336


   希望你朋友可以再有多一点的消息
ben小喇叭 发表于 12-5-2012 09:52 AM

她不说也没有办法
Digi 已经有 S3 website 了，2种颜色

http://www.digi.com.my/PhonesDevices/Samsung_GALAXYS3.do

ben小喇叭

回复 711# 4561336


   已经注册了，唯一可以做的只有等

kukubond007

http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_ ... _x-review-759p8.php
电池测试，S3赢很多
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_ ... _x-review-759p7.php
音效测试，S3赢一点点，但是还没算Voodoo Sound Support

MR.Beck

她不说也没有办法
Digi 已经有 S3 website 了，2种颜色
4561336 发表于 12-5-2012 11:36 AM

    价钱还不知道噢?

hkloke2000

电池测试，S3赢很多

音效测试，S3赢一点点，但是还没算Voodoo Sound Support
kukubond007 发表于 12-5-2012 12:22 PM

我猜已经不需Voodoo了，
我猜三星已经调整了驱动程序，
并整合了音乐效果，
很大可能会比Voodoo更好。


http://www.sogi.com.tw/newforum/article_list.aspx?topic_ID=6193085
SAMSUNG GALAXY S III 音樂播放器支援豐富的等化器功能，無論是外接耳機，或是使用楊聲器播放，都能帶來優異的音質呈現。






谷歌翻译,不要鸟我
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s_iii_vs_htc_one_x-review-759p7.php
三星I9300 GALAXY S III横空出世是最有才华的音乐家之一，并排挤在音频输出质量测试One X。
两个连接到外部放大器几乎相同的音量，
但银河S III具有更清洁，没有任何薄弱点输出。
另一方面，One X有高于平均的失真水平，这在高端智能手机是罕见的。


The Samsung I9300 Galaxy s III turned out to be one of the most talented musicians around and managed to edge out the One X in the audio output quality test.
The two have almost identical volume levels when connected to active external amplifiers, but the Galaxy S III has much cleaner output with no weak points whatsoever. The One X on the other hand has higher than average distortion levels, which is rare to be seen in a high-end smartphone.

leejeans

我猜已经不需Voodoo了，
我猜三星已经调整了驱动程序，
并整合了音乐效果，
很大可能会比Voodoo更好 ...
hkloke2000 发表于 12-5-2012 05:17 PM

太小看voodoo sound 了·

hkloke2000

太小看voodoo sound 了·
leejeans 发表于 12-5-2012 05:18 PM

我猜的,
不要忘记Voodoo是调三星放出来的源码,
Voodoo也是开源的,
如果三星拿回Voodoo源码参考或结和Voodoo源码调一调,
进一步改善,合情合理
就像SGS的XXJW4 BigMem Kernel

leejeans

我猜的,
不要忘记Voodoo是调三星放出来的源码,
Voodoo也是开源的,
如果三星拿回Voodoo源码参考或结和 ...
hkloke2000 发表于 12-5-2012 05:35 PM

这个就要高手来解释了

guohui

我猜的,
不要忘记Voodoo是调三星放出来的源码,
Voodoo也是开源的,
如果三星拿回Voodoo源码参考或结和 ...
hkloke2000 发表于 12-5-2012 05:35 PM

    Voodoo sound不是用samsung的源码，voodoo sound用的是wolfson放出的源码。

.Hardy.

到时候就懂咯，哈哈


(posted by mobile)

rickray

GSMArena
Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III vs. HTC One X: Alien vs. Predator
总结：
There's no good story without a villain. No villains here though because this isn't just another story. It rather is Android history being made. And we don't fool ourselves - both these superphones will be history next year, in the less dignified sense.

What we are trying to say is, there's no better smartphone here - just one that's more suited to your needs and taste. There's always an element of compromise - be it size against screen estate, power against battery life or looks against durability. What monster smartphones like the Samsung Galaxy S III and the HTC One X try to do is rule out compromises. That's why manufacturers don't cut any corners making them.

The Samsung Galaxy S III has a slight edge in processing, the Mali-400MP GPU nosing out the HTC One X ULP GeForce. It's also the one with the better screen: the 4.8" Super AMOLED has superior contrast, viewing angles, sunlight legibility and, thanks to the screen saturation modes, greater flexibility. It does use a PenTile matrix, but it hardly makes any difference at those ppi levels.

Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III
Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III

The still camera and video recording (in good lighting) and audio quality tests win a few more points for the Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III, and so do the better battery life and expandable storage.

Finally, Samsung have managed to teach their top dog plenty of neat software tricks and while some of them are rather useless (technology still hasn't reached the point where voice assistants are actually good for more than a few laughs), others are pretty cool (we really loved the Direct Call and Smart Stay features).

Yet the HTC One X is not without its weapons in this fight. For one, it's the better looking smartphone - we don't agree with those that call the Galaxy S III ugly, but its hyperglazed plastic body is humbled to near depressing levels of ordinary by the One X's matte polycarbonate unibody. It also comes with more built-in storage without raising the price (in fact the One X is a bit cheaper than the S III pre-orders).

HTC One X
HTC One X

The HTC One X camera actually comes out as the better performer in low-light conditions thanks to its bright F/2.0 aperture. We mustn't forget either that the HTC flagship is already available in plenty of countries, while the Samsung Galaxy S III units will only start leaving the factory in Gumi in a couple of weeks' time.

And then there's the choice between TouchWiz and Sense UI, which is a matter of aesthetics than anything else.

Anyway, back to where we started. Two superphones, one Android crown. The HTC One X managed to come to the market first, while the Galaxy S III is a little late, but has plenty to show for it. We're tempted to play it safe and split it equal. The HTC One X: this is what a droid flagship should look like. The Samsung Galaxy S III: that's what a droid flagship should perform like. But that won't be fair to either of them. They didn't get where they are by playing it safe.

It seems obvious that the Samsung Galaxy S III wouldn't have raised as the new standard-setter without a powerful challenger like the One X. There's no consolation prize here, no second-best. A fair fight and a win-win for Android.

结论：
外形HTC略胜。
Sense UI vs Touchwiz： 看个人喜好。
相机方面：拍照和拍video，S3表现的比较好。不过在暗灯光下1X会好一点。
电池：S3比1X耐更久。
音响：S3竟然比1x表现好。（beats浪得虚名？）

个人喜好：
用了S2那么久，我还是会选择S3。
没用过HTC，虽然sense评价很好，但touchwiz也很简单好用。太多animation反而更吃电。
反而S3这次有很多独家新功能的确很吸引人。
S3设计比较差很大原因是因为可以打开电池的关系。不过这真的很好。不但可以换电池（S2我就是时常换，不怕没电），还可以加microSD卡。大家应该试过手机hang，然后把电池拔掉的经验。万一S3会hang机，至少不用等到电池完了才能用。
只是滑面很容易沾指纹，matte会比较好。不过相信不久就会很多S3壳可以换。

rickray

hkloke2000

Voodoo sound不是用samsung的源码，voodoo sound用的是wolfson放出的源码。
guohui 发表于 12-5-2012 07:20 PM

https://opensource.samsung.com/index.jsp
源码是wolfson的
三星放出来的源代码已经包括wolfson放出的源码(不知道有没有任何调整/修改)
通常都是从三星下载源代码来修改的.
三星放出来不等于是三星的