【Running Man】 劉在石、池石鎮、金鐘國、Gary、哈哈、宋智孝、 李光洙 、宋鍾基專區

jerryhao

我還是我 发表于 21-5-2013 11:19 PM
绝对是。。。

另外，你的头像，有大图吗？

pm你了
终于有人识货了～
话说我期待tiffany跟金泰熙上running man~

carimembers

我還是我 发表于 21-5-2013 05:12 PM
the gary show算不算？虽然实际上是被全部人计算。。。

zombie特辑，智孝是如何变成他第一个马仔的？: ...

啊~你说到我也想起了！

carimembers

jerryhao 发表于 21-5-2013 05:45 PM
他应该是running man成员背叛最少的

同意！
话说，可以也传你头像大图吗？我是yoona , tiffany , taeyeon 的粉丝啊！

jerryhao

carimembers 发表于 22-5-2013 01:29 AM
同意！
话说，可以也传你头像大图吗？我是yoona , tiffany , taeyeon 的粉丝啊！

pm你了噢
我比较喜欢yoona~
这次头像是tiffany真的是没办法
实在太电眼了

carimembers

jerryhao 发表于 22-5-2013 01:46 AM
pm你了噢
我比较喜欢yoona~
这次头像是tiffany真的是没办法

感谢不尽啊～

K-POP-吃狗肉

继续支持持

heidy

话说~丛林那集~有人发现钟国不小心摸到对方—（丛林女生）的胸部吗？

submarine86

heidy 发表于 22-5-2013 01:09 PM
话说~丛林那集~有人发现钟国不小心摸到对方—（丛林女生）的胸部吗？

我在微薄网找到。。好像不是有心。。当时钟国应该有吓到而自然反应会推开对方。。

我還是我

羨慕。。。

K-POP-吃狗肉

奶奶健康康   值得摸摸   

carimembers

submarine86 发表于 22-5-2013 02:24 PM
我在微薄网找到。。好像不是有心。。当时钟国应该有吓到而自然反应会推开对方。。

角度问题吧？
哈哈。有福了～

carimembers

哎～星期一还很久啊～

angel7982

担心。。。LeeSsang他们出了点问题了呢。。希望他们可以早点解决问题吧。。。

.Hardy.

又有问题？

carimembers

angel7982 发表于 23-5-2013 03:15 PM
担心。。。LeeSsang他们出了点问题了呢。。希望他们可以早点解决问题吧。。。

什么问题？

angel7982

在面子书里看到的。。。Gary and Gil 在他们的各自的twitter里写的。。
以下是他们的粉丝翻译的哦。。。很长一下的。。不知道他们会停拍吗？

Summary of issue (From the victim's point of view):

Leessang owns a building that has 3 above ground floors and one underground floor.
There was a bbq restaurant on the 1st floor and the owner of that store is now complaining that the building owners (LeeSsang) kicked them out forcibly.
It's not legally incorrect but they claim it was a completely forced one-sided decision.

The twitter is then a rebuttal of the claims (Which is VERY long and do excuse me for not translating it line for line)

The first part is about how a reporter called them up in the morning to discuss the above issue and they agreed to talk with LeeSsang's legal team at 6PM
The reporter then calls during the day and then states that they will write the articles in 5mins time (Before the meeting mentioned above)

The next couple parts is about the story so far
-Yes they did purchase a building in May 2012 (Around 200 Meters Squared in internal area)
-They took on a lot of debt through it (Around $3.4 Million USD)

-In June 2012 one of the leases suddenly came to their houses without prior contact and suddenly told Gil's mother (While she was the only one at home) that they can't leave the building, shocking both his mother and himself
-Later on they told them through their spokesperson that their lease will not be renewed and were negotiating compensation
-The lessee then demanded around $300,000 USD + their initial lease deposit as compensation which was thought to be excessive
-The lessee then talk about how they were going to post banners on their store about this and how they were going to keep operating etc

-Leessang at this point couldn't meet them due to the volatile nature of the situation

-The lessee then modified their store by adding a cafe style take out window and increasing the number of tables without permission
-Talks about how they've always moved their cars when asked even at their own expenses (Parking fines for parking elsewhere)

-Then talks about how given that they have their offices on the 4th floor, the lessee could have visited them at any time (A counter claim to the fact the lessee said that they have been trying for a year to meet them)
-Leessang even sent them a letter (Not sure what about, they just say it was sent due to heartbreak and frustration)

-Then mentions how if the lessee wanted to have proper discussions then they shouldn't have mentioned stuff like sticking up banners (In an effort to devalue their image)
-Their lawyers and spokesperson continued to negotiate with the lessee but the lessee just kept claiming that they had a verbal agreement with the ex-owners for a 5 year lease
-They then asked that they be allowed to operate for 5 years and kept mentioning verbal contracts (LB - I assume he means that the lessee wanted to just have a verbal contract and not a written one)
-They told them that this sort of request was impossible to uphold just as the original contract was due to expire and could not understand the details of the verbal agreement between the lessee and (i presume ex) building owner

-They then offered them around $100,000 USD + 3 months free lease + deposit in December but they rejected this offer

-They then decided that further discussions were no longer possible and filed a suit

-After that the lessee contacted them first and asked for around $150,000 USD + 3 months free lease + deposit
-They then finally negotiated for $130,000 USD + 3 months free lease + deposit and for the lessee to leave in March 2013

-However the lessee went back on their word and they kept changing the terms of the agreement and the court case had to continue

-On April 3rd was the date of the first hearing and in an effort to resolve this issue amicably, they asked for an arbitration on April 25th

-The courts then advised us to settle for around $110,000 USD + deposit on the condition that they leave in June
-The lessee refused this

-The next point is them saying how they never even considered opening a BBQ restaurant in the same place as the lessee and they told the lessee about this

-The next point is about how hurt they were and if they had really had been unreasonable in their demands, why the lessee did not mention this in the courts

-The lessee refused to accept the court terms and have filed an appeal (This is where they currently stand)
-Their lawyers and spokesperson continued to try and resolve this amicably but it couldn't be done.

-The next point is about how people are talking about laws regarding protection for lessees etc
-This however isn't valid in this case as their contract already expired in October 2012 and yet they are currently still operating

-Then talking about how all of this really is making them look greedy
-How they are not considering suing for defamation or spreading of false information
-Really sad to see how the article went up without discussions with them and how they are being made to look like greedy people just because they are celebrities

-Lastly they are not writing this to cause conflict but just to inform everyone of the real facts

[admin Moka]

carimembers

angel7982 发表于 23-5-2013 05:06 PM
在面子书里看到的。。。Gary and Gil 在他们的各自的twitter里写的。。
以下是他们的粉丝翻译的哦。。。很 ...

看起来好像很严重似的。。。。

我還是我

誰可以翻一下？

謝謝

climate

刚刚看到了Running Man在TV2的广告 , 是华语字幕 .

6月2号开始4点  

angel7982

carimembers 发表于 25-5-2013 12:34 AM
看起来好像很严重似的。。。。

是咯。。。但是现在又没有看到他们的消息了呢。。。真的担心。。。。