|
火箭又被藍眼打臉:希盟不廢除消費稅;到底要相信林冠英還是努鲁伊莎呢?
[复制链接]
|
|
发表于 27-4-2017 09:18 AM
|
显示全部楼层
年纪老香港人用拼音是什么逻辑来的?
繁体字比仓颉还难学啊,干嘛香港学校又教繁体字?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 27-4-2017 09:24 AM
|
显示全部楼层
你好。
拼音比仓颉还容易。会拼音,简繁日韩德的输入,目前是没问题。港台用繁体,自有他的优缺点。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 27-4-2017 09:31 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 27-4-2017 09:40 AM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 宋漫山 于 27-4-2017 09:43 AM 编辑
你好。
我目前的生意是家族生意(父辈留下来的),经济自由才能各处参赛。
人上人就不敢当,大马那些白手起家,能在她国开学校,赌场。瞬间拥有大量资产的人。那些才历害。
有位台湾朋友更高明,中港台马都有自己的温柔窝。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 27-4-2017 09:49 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 27-4-2017 05:32 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 27-4-2017 05:40 PM
|
显示全部楼层
宋议员都被看穿了,却一直编故事有意义咩?有高潮到咩?有爽到咩?不会觉得自己性格很扭曲的咩?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 27-4-2017 05:41 PM
|
显示全部楼层
納吉當教育部長時,廢除了《1961年教育法令》第21(2)條文:
教育部長有權力 隨時隨地把各源流學校包括華小改制為國民學校,也就是馬來文小學。
如果 0% GST = 廢除 GST,
那麼 大家同意把 《1961年教育法令》第21(2)條文 留著,
只要教育部長不執行,也就是沒有人隨時隨地把各源流學校包括華小改制為國民學校,
就等於廢除了,對嗎?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 27-4-2017 05:47 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 27-4-2017 06:01 PM
|
显示全部楼层
正解來了。
1. DAP Secretary-General YAB Lim Guan Eng had revealed that Pakatan Harapan had made a decision to reduce the GST rate from 6% to 0% as part of their campaign manifesto.
2. He continues to insist that reducing GST to 0% is the same as abolishing GST.
3. This is untrue as the government and businesses will continue to bear the unnecessary administrative expenses of GST-compliance but does not give benefits to any party. It will become a big negative with no positive benefits.
4. This makes a mockery of YAB Lim's statement that it is more cost-effective to retain the tax, but at a zero rate.
5. Malaysia will then make history as the first and only country in the world which has a GST system set at 0%. The world will laugh at us for having a tax system that will burden the government and businesses with administrative duties and expenses but has no tax revenue for the government.
6. YAB Lim also says that even if they win Putrajaya, there are doubts that they have the power to abolish GST.
7. This shows that Pakatan is insincere about abolishing GST and is implicitly acknowledging that implementing GST had always been the right decision by the BN Government.
8. Pakatan frequently gives the impression that GST is an additional new tax that burdens the people but they do not acknowledge that with the introduction of GST, two taxes have been abolished, another two taxes have been reduced and BR1M had been substantially increased.
9. The Sales Tax and Service Tax had been abolished. While the corporate income tax had been reduced to 24% from 26% in 2008.
10. The personal income tax rate was also reduced to 24% from 28% in 2008. On top of this reduction, the tax bands have been expanded and various deductions have been allowed to the net effect that anyone earning RM4,000 per month and below do not pay any income tax.This also meant that the income tax payable by the middle-income group had also reduced.
11. BR1M payments were also increased from RM650 in 2014 to RM1,200 for this year. Along with the effective income tax exemption for those whose income is RM4,000 per month or less, this means that the B40 income group is taxed at a negative rate by the government after the implementation of GST - meaning the B40 group is a net beneficiary of these tax reforms.
12. Pakatan knows that the government has lost RM40 billion in Petroleum revenues in 2016 due to slump in global oil prices and had foregone another RM20 billion every year from abolishing sales and service taxes. The govt also has to bear the tens of billions foregone yearly from the reduction of corporate tax, reduction in personal income tax and increase in BR1M payments.
13. With all the money foregone as part of the tax reforms and the fall in petroleum revenues, abolishing GST or reducing the GST rate to zero is unrealistic and will hurt Malaysia.
14. Pakatan knows this - hence their reluctance to completely abolish GST.
15. While the rest of the world is striving to become more competitive by modernizing their taxation systems through reducing corporate and personal income taxes and implementing consumption taxes such as GST, Pakatan wants to do the opposite to increase corporate taxes and dismantle GST.
16. One wonders why Pakatan wants to move Malaysia backwards instead of forwards by making unrealistic and economically damaging promises?
Barisan Nasional Strategic Communications Team,
Putrajaya
27 April 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 27-4-2017 06:06 PM
|
显示全部楼层
一燈大師 发表于 27-4-2017 06:01 PM
正解來了。
1. DAP Secretary-General YAB Lim Guan Eng had revealed that Pakatan Harapan had made a decision to reduce the GST rate from 6% to 0% as part of their campaign manifesto.
2. He conti ...
酱长的鸡肠,马华江夏仔的丢脸英语水准看得懂咩?
|
评分
-
查看全部评分
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 27-4-2017 06:36 PM
|
显示全部楼层
变色龙的想法符合现代民情噢 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 28-4-2017 02:21 PM
|
显示全部楼层
“废除和零消费税是一样”
-qualified professional accountant, 林冠英。
如果是一樣,為何還有 masih layak menuntut kembali kredit cukai input。
Pembekalan Berkadar Sifar [sunting | sunting sumber]
Barangan dan perkhidmatan yang berada di bawah kategori ini akan dikenakan cukai sebanyak 0% pada setiap peringkat di rantaian pembekalan. Kesemua pihak kecuali pengguna akhir masih layak menuntut kembali kredit cukai input jika ada dikenakan cukai input oleh mana-mana pihak semasa pembelian input. Pengguna akhir tidak perlu menanggung beban cukai GST berkadar standard iaitu 6%.
Barangan dan perkhidmatan yang dieksport ke luar negara tidak dikenakan cukai sebanyak 6% sebaliknya dikenakan kadar 0%.
cari 有 其他的 qualified professional accountant 解說嗎?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-4-2017 02:28 PM
|
显示全部楼层
一燈大師 发表于 28-4-2017 02:21 PM
“废除和零消费税是一样”
-qualified professional accountant, 林冠英。
如果是一樣,為何還有 masih layak menuntut kembali kredit cukai input。
cari 有 其他的 qualified professional accountant ...
如果有个 qualified professional accountant 在这里解释,马华江夏仔会敢接招或reply吗?还是一样都是夹着尾巴逃掉?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-4-2017 02:29 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-4-2017 02:35 PM
|
显示全部楼层
一燈大師 发表于 28-4-2017 02:21 PM
“废除和零消费税是一样”
-qualified professional accountant, 林冠英。
如果是一樣,為何還有 masih layak menuntut kembali kredit cukai input。
cari 有 其他的 qualified professional accountant ...
马华江夏仔研究苦思 0% gst那么久,就只有这种功力?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-4-2017 02:39 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 28-4-2017 02:46 PM
|
显示全部楼层
從廢除消費稅,到廢除和零消費稅一樣,如果一樣,為何當初不高喊零消費稅? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-4-2017 02:50 PM
|
显示全部楼层
马华江夏仔敢敢接受楼上的挑战,不是有机会找到答案了咯。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-4-2017 03:01 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
本周最热论坛帖子
|