|
|
[更新]Toyota Prius C <<阿瓜 Aqua>>~~保养须知,电池价钱
[复制链接]
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 12:07 AM
|
显示全部楼层
jscyl1980 发表于 22-1-2014 11:36 PM 
D-Segment 做到太偶像。。。买的起的uncle 不会欣赏咯。。。。。就好像我
人家欧洲的都带有classic 味 ...
像美国那样的市场就可以咯,车便宜。
好像也没什么人加B Seg吧。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 12:15 AM
|
显示全部楼层
jscyl1980 发表于 22-1-2014 11:32 PM 
我亲眼看过新车主表演。。。。退牙慢到。。。。
在highway 顺顺驾还可以。。。
city drive 还不能到a ...
上次在同一天里试了K5再去试mazda6.。。分别真的很大~尤其大家都是用6AT,但mazda6真的比它顺很多,在kickdown的时候反应快很多。。
K5虽然也是6AT但那顿挫感真的连camry的4AT都可以胜它。。。先此声明,mazda6我是试2.0的。。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 12:16 AM
|
显示全部楼层
A number of automakers have issued official statements and responses in relation to the National Automotive Policy (NAP 2014) that was announced by MITI on Monday – next, we have a press release issued by Proton Edar Dealers Association (PEDA) Malaysia in response to NAP 2014.
“PEDA regrets that NAP 2014 did not provide a clearer framework and a roadmap on the direction the government wants to drive the national car (Proton) in terms of producing its own design, chassis and engine,” PEDA president Armin Baniaz Pahamin said in the association’s statement. He added that the policy will encourage the rebadging of national cars instead of us building our own.
Here is the rest of the PEDA statement in full:
“In the past, the government drove Proton to invest in technology capable of building its own engine, its own car and to move away from rebadging. For years, the dealers had to sell these vehicles with a very thin margin, and the public had to pay more for Proton cars due to a higher cost of production.
Unlike the previous NAP, which was silent on Perodua as a national car, NAP 2014 stated Perodua as a national car, although Perodua is foreign-owned and only rebadging already established vehicles.
There is no clear guideline as to what constitutes a ‘national car’ and ‘non-national’ and without it, incentives can be abused. At the moment, the term ‘national car status’ is subjective, and is interpreted and understood differently by various parties, even by different authorities.
Incentives should only be given to a ‘national car’ to keep prices competitive for the public, while investments are made for fully-born Malaysia-made vehicles, if that is still the drive.
NAP 2 has failed to increase Bumiputera participation in the dealership network as well as preserving a specific segment for Proton market share, which was part of its objectives. There is also no report available on the achievements of NAP 2 in its entirety.
Incentives for Proton is not about protecting Proton, but should be given as a reward to acquire future technology for Proton to produce reasonable and competitively-priced Malaysia-made vehicles instead of rebadging.
We cannot compare Malaysia to Thailand and Indonesia, because our population is only one-third, if not less than Thailand as well as Indonesia’s car buying population. If we want our national car to succeed, the government must provide a more prominent policy.
Cheaper cars can be attained either with better economies of scale by preserving certain segment for certain car models that are researched, designed and built/produced in Malaysia, or through rebadging of cars without hefty R&D investment, like Perodua. The current policy is encouraging the Perodua business of rebadging.
PEDA welcomes all efforts and policies for cheaper cars, but incentives should be given to manufacturers that produce made-in-Malaysia vehicles from their own R&D. This is the essence of the ‘national car’ project.
PEDA lauds the establishment of the Malaysia Automotive Council (MAC), but appeals to the council to include all in the automotive eco-system – banks, association of used car dealers, vendors association and association of dealers representatives – to be part of the council. This is important to achieve NAP 2014′s objectives of promoting a competitive and sustainable domestic automotive industry.
PEDA is also disappointed that there was no directive for Malaysia automotive manufacturer/distributor/assembler(s) to conform to the New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) and elevate our motor vehicle safety standard.
Proton has conformed and complied with the NCAP, but most other manufacturers as per the list displayed on JPJ’s website have been given a waiver and exemption, and are profiteering from a cheaper cost of production at the cost of public safety.
PEDA disagrees with the voluntary inspection for vehicle proposal for vehicles older than five years. No one would want to volunteer and pay extra for an inspection in the light of the rising cost of living. If an inspection is necessary, it should be mandatory.
Perhaps insurance companies or banks can bear the cost of inspection when car buyers renew their annual insurance policies, as part of the insurer’s measure to safeguard its asset. The government can also reduce the insurance policy premium for cars that have passed the mandatory inspection.
看到以上的文章,都觉得Proton还在希望政府给自己更多优惠。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 12:18 AM
|
显示全部楼层
yyheen 发表于 23-1-2014 12:15 AM 
上次在同一天里试了K5再去试mazda6.。。分别真的很大~尤其大家都是用6AT,但mazda6真的比它顺很多,在ki ...
马之达说到他的Skyactive 牙箱很厉害的哦,
结合CVT, AT, DSG的好处。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 12:20 AM
|
显示全部楼层
weilitng 发表于 23-1-2014 12:02 AM 
Accord Carmy 那个 Range , TC的 Teana 好像赢他们两个。
不过我公司还是神车加卖鱼,Alza有60%
Teana应该不可能会胜accord和camry。。
现在是等新teana的到来~但可惜没有V6了。。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 12:21 AM
|
显示全部楼层
weilitng 发表于 23-1-2014 12:07 AM 
像美国那样的市场就可以咯,车便宜。
好像也没什么人加B Seg吧。
如果你有接触过北美和欧洲人的话,他们并没有想象中的那么in
他们在审美观是很保守很classic 的。。。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 12:26 AM
|
显示全部楼层
weilitng 发表于 23-1-2014 12:02 AM 
Accord Carmy 那个 Range , TC的 Teana 好像赢他们两个。
不过我公司还是神车加卖鱼,Alza有60%
Teana 赢完camry 和 accord ......
Honda 到现在隔音和车脚都没有nissan 和 toyota 的功力
这两样是uncle 们买车所需求的
Teana 可是很棒的车来,只是没价而已
Camry 就还是保留一路丰田造车理念的
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 12:30 AM
|
显示全部楼层
weilitng 发表于 23-1-2014 12:16 AM 
A number of automakers have issued official statements and responses in relation to the National Aut ...
作晚新闻已经confirmed 会再给钱它们搞出口喔
他们的尊严真的很高。。。。
本帖最后由 jscyl1980 于 23-1-2014 12:45 AM 编辑
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 12:33 AM
|
显示全部楼层
weilitng 发表于 23-1-2014 12:07 AM 
像美国那样的市场就可以咯,车便宜。
好像也没什么人加B Seg吧。
Jazz 和 yaris 在北美很好卖的。。。大学生喜欢。。。
那边修车很贵的。。。日系还是他们的最爱。。。
Gm,ford 车 是大美国主义人喜欢囖
|
评分
-
查看全部评分
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 12:36 AM
|
显示全部楼层
weilitng 发表于 23-1-2014 12:18 AM 
马之达说到他的Skyactive 牙箱很厉害的哦,
结合CVT, AT, DSG的好处。
它那牙箱真的很行~慢跑像CVT,快跑像AT。。但就没有像DSG那么夸张啦。。但它的反应算是不错了。。
|
评分
-
查看全部评分
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 12:38 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 12:42 AM
|
显示全部楼层
yyheen 发表于 23-1-2014 12:36 AM 
它那牙箱真的很行~慢跑像CVT,快跑像AT。。但就没有像DSG那么夸张啦。。但它的反应算是不错了。。
马奶下的mazda 没有0w20 , skyactiv 被扣了分
这引擎里面很精密,sc 给你5w40 就只是拿来跑highway
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 12:47 AM
|
显示全部楼层
lkeathing 发表于 22-1-2014 10:46 PM 
那要多少K才换?
自己出去外面买一粒来换。。。。
去sc的时候换回ori就可以了。。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 12:48 AM
|
显示全部楼层
jscyl1980 发表于 23-1-2014 12:42 AM 
马奶下的mazda 没有0w20 , skyactiv 被扣了分
这引擎里面很精密,sc 给你5w40 就只是拿来跑highway
那就要准备自己换油咯~
现在mazda3要来了,我朋友连车都没看就跑去下定金了~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 12:54 AM
|
显示全部楼层
yyheen 发表于 23-1-2014 12:48 AM 
那就要准备自己换油咯~
现在mazda3要来了,我朋友连车都没看就跑去下定金了~
现在的mazda 买的过囖
只是skyactiv 都值得了,不过如mazda 6 highway 120-140kph 油耗去到多少?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 12:57 AM
|
显示全部楼层
yyheen 发表于 23-1-2014 12:48 AM 
那就要准备自己换油咯~
现在mazda3要来了,我朋友连车都没看就跑去下定金了~
不懂马奶下skyactiv 车主有几个去用0w20?
很多人还是认为viscosity 越高越好,车吃油没力就赖车烂
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 09:34 AM
来自手机
|
显示全部楼层
无边海 发表于 23-1-2014 12:47 AM
自己出去外面买一粒来换。。。。
去sc的时候换回ori就可以了。。
Prius 的 acc. filter在那里,怎樣拆? 现在在SC,但没叫我换。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 09:36 AM
|
显示全部楼层
jscyl1980 发表于 23-1-2014 12:26 AM 
Teana 赢完camry 和 accord ......
Honda 到现在隔音和车脚都没有nissan 和 toyota 的功力
这两样是unc ...
赫赫,我是说销量啦,不是评价 。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 09:39 AM
|
显示全部楼层
weilitng 发表于 23-1-2014 09:36 AM 
赫赫,我是说销量啦,不是评价 。
teana 销量有多过accord 和camry?
你们最近都讲销量喔
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 23-1-2014 09:50 AM
|
显示全部楼层
jscyl1980 发表于 23-1-2014 12:30 AM 
作晚新闻已经confirmed 会再给钱它们搞出口喔
他们的尊严真的很高。。。。
还真的是国产车之父,一天不死, 他们还是继续很有瓶盐。
五年后没有AP和车降价只是竞选口号, 给新的CKD EEV 折扣是好事情,现在扑腾代理又来玩野了。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
本周最热论坛帖子
|