她被指假結婚 得不到亡夫公積金

ohia2016

兩姐妹指一名中國女子與她們的已故兄弟假結婚，要高庭宣判婚姻無效、原有的公積金提名仍然有效，裁定這名中國女子無權獲享兄弟的一半公積金；中國女子卻稱婚姻真實，兩人為合法夫妻。

據《聯合早報》報導，經6天審訊，高庭司法委員廖學銘判兩姐妹勝訴，表明他接受兩姐妹說法，指孫水源（死時52歲）和刁艷梅（47歲，水療師）確實假結婚，好讓後者能在新加坡居留和工作。證據顯示，刁艷梅在2011年10月註冊結婚約一周後，就申請工作準證，最後成功獲得。

司法委員昨天發表判詞，裁定孫水源在2009年1月5日作的公積金提名有效，並沒有因為他與刁艷梅結婚而失效。

司法委員說，公積金法令的用途不是要讓假結婚、尚未死亡的一方獲利。綜合證據，他認為死者無意讓刁艷梅得到他的公積金存款。

他指出，從死者的遺囑和公積金提名，加上他和母親及姐妹的關係來看，死者沒理由不要供養家庭，包括患癌的母親。司法委員認為死者知道公積金提名可以撤銷，但未必知道結婚會使提名失效。

他說，死者雖然結婚，但公積金結單還註明他在2009年1月作了提名；也沒證據顯示，死者與他的提名受益人鬧翻，“證據其實剛好相反”。

婚姻，姐弟情真假不用緊，金錢是真的。

ohia2016

司法委員說，兩姐妹和訴方證人的證詞可靠，刁艷梅卻不可信，供證時無法證明她在宣誓書中的多個說法。

他指刁艷梅被盤問時，不清楚孫水源的家庭背景，連他有幾個兄弟姐妹、有個相差兩分鐘的龍鳳胎妹妹孫亞春、其教育程度，有沒有服過兵役等都不知道。

刁蠻的法官。

省電俠

陸妹在坡妹眼中 貪錢 勾引坡佬的刻板印像是沒辦法改過來的

法官已判死者和陸妹的婚姻無效 那第一受益人就是老母 假如患癌老母鬥不過病魔 那麼死者的CPF就會落入…

jellyfish_8

2009年提名，2011年结婚结果被推翻。
看来马劳们还是立遗嘱求安心啊

jack_chong

假结婚犯法的，赔了夫人又折兵。。。

jellyfish_8

你怎样证明假的？
是问男女有没有一起生活？有么有性生活？还是常识问答比如男方的家庭背景？

ohia2016

jellyfish_8 发表于 8-9-2016 04:10 PM
你怎样证明假的？
是问男女有没有一起生活？有么有性生活？还是常识问答比如男方的家庭背景？

至少知道有沒有割包皮lah

花心大萝卜

什么鬼新闻来的。我在 My Paper 都没有看到 pun。

ohia2016

花心大萝卜 发表于 9-9-2016 07:36 AM
什么鬼新闻来的。我在 My Paper 都没有看到 pun。

SINGAPORE: Two sisters may now be able to get more than S$170,000 (RM511,560) in their late brother's Central Provident Fund (CPF) savings, after the High Court here ruled that the money should go to them instead of a Chinese national he married in 2011.

Soon Ah See, 56 and Soon Ah Choon, 54, found out their brother Soon Chwee Guan was married to Diao Yanmei, 47, only after he died in August 2013, and that his CPF monies would go her.
They believed it was a sham marriage and took the case to court. Through their lawyer A. Rajandran, they filed an injunction in the High Court to restrain the CPF Board from releasing any monies in Soon's CPF account. It was granted in September 2013 and has been in place since.
Soon, who would be 55 years old now, had nominated his sisters as the beneficiaries to the money in January 2009. According to court documents, he did not tell his family about the marriage, although he was close to them, and lived with his mother and sister in Bukit Batok.


  


In his written judgment on Tuesday, Judicial Commissioner Edmund Leow said he accepted the sisters' submission that the defendant and the deceased had not entered into a genuine marriage.
"This was probably done so that the defendant could bolster her chances of staying on in Singapore and working here. It is no coincidence that just a little over a week after the marriage, the defendant applied for a work permit," wrote. She was successful and hired to be a spa therapist.
Court documents also said that Soon told his friend he entered into a sham marriage. The friend, Lee Hock Hoo, 71, testified that he told Soon the marriage was wrong. However, Soon said "the arrangement would enable him to have some money to spend every month as he was unemployed". He would be paid S$4,000 (RM12,000) by Diao, and a monthly sum of S$400 (RM1,200).
Diao had claimed to love Soon, and to meet him for dinner about once a week, but could not say why she loved him, and claimed they would eat fish, when Soon did not and was allergic to seafood.
She also could not pinpoint the locations they apparently had sex at.
JC Leow also pointed out that Diao did not know how many siblings he had, which schools he attended, or which brand of beer he preferred. JC Leow said that Diao's evidence "could not stand up to scrutiny", and that she made various assertions in written sworn statements, but was unable to substantiate them at the six-day trial.
While JC Leow said that the marriage was valid according to the Women's Charter, it was "not the sort of marriage that falls within the meaning of marriage" under the CPF Act.
"On the facts of this case, I am satisfied that the deceased had no intention of benefiting the defendant with his CPF monies," he said.
If no appeal is filed in a month, he ordered for the discharge of the injunction which prevented the release of Soon's CPF savings, and the monies released to the sisters. – The Straits Times/Asian News Network

jellyfish_8

里面有 $170，000，却口袋无分文。
辛苦了大半辈子的积蓄也用不到，还要被逼走歪道。

最后死在用不到钱的残酷事实。
典型波仔的人生，安息。

很多人跟你一样活不到85岁。