查看: 2641|回复: 22
|
我不想还信用卡债....
[复制链接]
|
|
发表于 27-2-2008 07:21 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 27-2-2008 07:28 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 27-2-2008 09:22 AM
|
显示全部楼层
这时候和银行将什么都没有用,你只有还他们钱。
你可以和他们商量可否减少收费。
另外,你要想想你是什么时候不见的,为什么不见,
下一次可要小心点。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 27-2-2008 09:51 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 27-2-2008 10:02 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 27-2-2008 10:19 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 applely 于 27-2-2008 10:02 AM 发表
被刷了多少钱??
总共两千元............. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 27-2-2008 10:51 PM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 7# liang_2002 的帖子
一定要快点settle,不然利上加利。。。。你就死了。。。
还有,等下信用破产就跟加的不好了。。。
贷款买屋,买车都会有问题。。。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-2-2008 01:50 AM
|
显示全部楼层
表傻了
到最后麻不是要給的
只能怪自己粗心大意
我一個朋友給‘爆格’家里
拿了他的卡刷十多千 結果銀行一句
我們的terms有講 卡一定要隨身的 這個是你的責任
都不知道要不要把卡帶在身上好
我都取消很多卡了 不敢再拿 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-2-2008 09:51 AM
|
显示全部楼层
买份 CPP 保险,年费 RM98,保你全家人 (五个人) 的钱包。
信用卡盗用 - 报失前的盗用,最多赔 RM4400,报失后的最多赔 RM300k。
身份证、License、Touch n Go、提款卡、Passport、... 不见了有赔。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-2-2008 10:09 AM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 harimau 于 28-2-2008 09:51 AM 发表
买份 CPP 保险,年费 RM98,保你全家人 (五个人) 的钱包。
信用卡盗用 - 报失前的盗用,最多赔 RM4400,报失后的最多赔 RM300k。
身份证、License、Touch n Go、提款卡、Passport、... 不见了有赔。
Harimau大大,什么保险公司有这个CPP?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-2-2008 10:25 AM
|
显示全部楼层
回复 11# 有目标的大头 的帖子
他们是和信用卡发卡银行合作的,目前以下的银行有加入这个 plan。
Alliance Bank
CIMB Bank
Citibank
Hong Leong Bank
Standard Chartered Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-2-2008 10:34 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-2-2008 10:48 AM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 harimau 于 28-2-2008 09:51 AM 发表
买份 CPP 保险,年费 RM98,保你全家人 (五个人) 的钱包。
信用卡盗用 - 报失前的盗用,最多赔 RM4400,报失后的最多赔 RM300k。
身份证、License、Touch n Go、提款卡、Passport、... 不见了有赔。
枕样赔?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-2-2008 11:18 AM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 harimau 于 28-2-2008 09:51 AM 发表
买份 CPP 保险,年费 RM98,保你全家人 (五个人) 的钱包。
信用卡盗用 - 报失前的盗用,最多赔 RM4400,报失后的最多赔 RM300k。
身份证、License、Touch n Go、提款卡、Passport、... 不见了有赔。
这个我也买了,但是我没把护照资料也加上去,因为我看到那表格上注明填上卡资料,所以我只填了所有的卡资料而已。现在才知道原来护照也能受保的。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-2-2008 11:38 AM
|
显示全部楼层
Card Protection Assistance Coverage^
Worldwide coverage YES
FREE 24-hour loss reporting line for ALL cards YES
Fraud protection due to lost/stolen cards (prior to notification) Up to RM4,400*
Fraud protection due to lost/stolen cards (after notification) Up to RM300,000
Financial Assistance Coverage^
Replacement cash RM150
Wallet/handbag reimbursement RM375
Communication and replacement of
• financial cards (e.g. credit, debit, ATM cards)
• valuable documents (e.g. IC, passport, driver’s licence)
• stored-value cards
Up to RM1,000**
Unauthorised use of card PIN RM250
Card retained by an ATM & subsequently used without authorisation RM250
Travel Assistance
Coverage^
Emergency cash advance Up to RM2,200
Emergency hotel bill payment (advance) Up to RM6,000
Emergency travel ticket replacement (advance) Up to RM10,000
Additional Services Coverage^
Registration of valuable document information (e.g. credit card numbers, passport number) Unlimited
* RM440 per card, up to a maximum of 10 cards
** Financial card replacement fee of RM50 a card, up to a maximum of 5 cards
^ Limited to amount stated per member, per membership year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 28-2-2008 11:52 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-2-2008 12:35 AM
|
显示全部楼层
希望可以HELP
Most unaware of RM250 limited liability
CARDHOLDERS need not pay more than RM250whenever their lost or stolen credit cards are used by others. Yet, oftentimes,they end up paying much more.
This isbecause Bank Negara has not informed cardholders that they do not have to paymore than RM250 for fraudulent transactions carried out using their lost orstolen cards, when they had not acted fraudulently and had informed the banksabout the lost or stolen cards as soon as possible.
Thisprotection is given under Clause 13.2 of Bank Negara's Credit Card Guideline("The cardholder's maximum liability for unauthorised transactions as aconsequence of a lost or stolen credit card shall be confined to a limitspecified by the issuer of credit cards, which shall not exceed RM250 providedthe cardholder has not acted fraudulently or has not failed to inform theissuer of credit cards as soon as reasonably practicable after having foundthat his credit card is lost or stolen").
Banks knowabout Clause 13.2 but have chosen to ignore it. Instead they pursue cardholdersfor the fraudulent transactions.
They willtell cardholders that a clause in the credit card contracts states that alltransactions carried out before the loss of the cards are reported to thebanks, are deemed to be carried out by the cardholders.
Manycardholders then pay up because they are unaware of the RM250 limitedliability.
Bank Negarashould rule that:
·THERM250 maximum liability on fraudulent transactions is highlighted tocardholders in the card agreements as well as in the monthly cardstatements.
·BANKSare not allowed to insert any clause in the card agreement which is contrary toClause 13.2.
·BANKSshould refund all money in excess of the RM250 collected from cardholders whosecases clearly come under Clause 13.2.
S.M. MOHAMED IDRIS,
President,
Consumers Association of Penang .
(Source: TheStar Online) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-2-2008 10:37 AM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 harimau 于 28-2-2008 09:51 AM 发表
买份 CPP 保险,年费 RM98,保你全家人 (五个人) 的钱包。
信用卡盗用 - 报失前的盗用,最多赔 RM4400,报失后的最多赔 RM300k。
身份证、License、Touch n Go、提款卡、Passport、... 不见了有赔。
原帖由 harimau 于 28-2-2008 10:25 AM 发表
他们是和信用卡发卡银行合作的,目前以下的银行有加入这个 plan。
Alliance Bank
CIMB Bank
Citibank
Hong Leong Bank
Standard Chartered Bank
既然这个保险是信用卡申请一起的, 怎样保全家人 (五个人) 的钱包? 如果我家其他人是用别家银行的卡? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 29-2-2008 10:42 AM
|
显示全部楼层
Most unaware of RM250 limited liability
CARDHOLDERS need not pay more than RM250whenever their lost or stolen credit cards are used by others. Yet, oftentimes,they end up paying much more.
This isbecause Bank Negara has not informed cardholders that they do not have to paymore than RM250 for fraudulent transactions carried out using their lost orstolen cards, when they had not acted fraudulently and had informed the banksabout the lost or stolen cards as soon as possible.
Thisprotection is given under Clause 13.2 of Bank Negara's Credit Card Guideline("The cardholder's maximum liability for unauthorised transactions as aconsequence of a lost or stolen credit card shall be confined to a limitspecified by the issuer of credit cards, which shall not exceed RM250 providedthe cardholder has not acted fraudulently or has not failed to inform theissuer of credit cards as soon as reasonably practicable after having foundthat his credit card is lost or stolen").
Banks knowabout Clause 13.2 but have chosen to ignore it. Instead they pursue cardholdersfor the fraudulent transactions.
They willtell cardholders that a clause in the credit card contracts states that alltransactions carried out before the loss of the cards are reported to thebanks, are deemed to be carried out by the cardholders.
  Manycardholders then pay up because they are unaware of the RM250 limitedliability.
Bank Negarashould rule that:
  ·THERM250 maximum liability on fraudulent transactions is highlighted tocardholders in the card agreements as well as in the monthly cardstatements.
·BANKSare not allowed to insert any clause in the card agreement which is contrary toClause 13.2.
·BANKSshould refund all money in excess of the RM250 collected from cardholders whosecases clearly come under Clause 13.2.
S.M. MOHAMED IDRIS,
President,
Consumers Association of Penang .
(Source: TheStar Online)
 ---------------------------------------
哗.. 原来有这样的条例哦....
可是在没有报失的情况下, 怎样证明什么时候开始, 那些钱不是你花的呢? 等下有心人自己刷的, 然后说信用卡被偷了怎么办?
除非你有不在场证据, 例如: 你的Transaction 是在新加坡, 可是你人明明在古晋, 没有出境过.. 就能证明. 在本地刷的, 很难有不在场证据呐... 如果是在古晋的Transaction, 银行可能会不相信这样咯..
[ 本帖最后由 applely 于 29-2-2008 10:52 AM 编辑 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
本周最热论坛帖子
|