那款“防毒或杀毒”软件比较好？

ah_beng78

请坛主删了小弟之前一个贴（没得选投票那个贴），谢谢。

请问大家用的是哪一款“防毒和杀毒”软件？
可以分享一下吗？他的功能，防毒效率，杀毒效率又如何？
当然我希望软件都是一些公平的设定，比如说：scan compressed file; scan boot sector; scan system file or subfolder; deep scan or huerastic scan等等。
之后，大家capture screen放上来比较比较如何？看看你一款会比较适合，哪一款比较强。

p/s:我的电脑还没有update的Antivirus，哈哈。。。吃些再放上来

ah_beng78

我打算用Nod32，所以选了Nod32。大家呢？

爱情龙卷风

我是用着AVG free edition,不过看见论坛上很多人都用kaspersky,真的那么好用吗?

Hitman47

原帖由 爱情龙卷风 于 27-8-2005 08:10 PM 发表
我是用着AVG free edition,不过看见论坛上很多人都用kaspersky,真的那么好用吗?

没错，Kaspersky真的很好用，之前我的电脑中了MSN的Virus，我用Norton根本Scan不到，过后有一个会员介绍我安装Kaspersky，我立刻安装Kaspersky，过后立刻Scan到了并且把其他Scan不到的Virus,Backdoor一起解决！！！！
现在我的电脑安全了，没有什么问题！！！真的要谢谢那位会员介绍我使用Kaspersky！！！！！

ah_beng78

原帖由 Hitman47 于 30/808/2005 20:20 发表

没错，Kaspersky真的很好用，之前我的电脑中了MSN的Virus，我用Norton根本Scan不到，过后有一个会员介绍我安装Kaspersky，我立刻安装Kaspersky，过后立刻Scan到了并且把其他Scan不到的Virus,Backdoor一起解决！ ...

想请问一下，那个Kaspersky，他用的system resource会多吗？可以在taskmanager里看得到。我刚刚才选用Nod32，他用的system resource大概在20M（包括了全部，nod32kernal,nod32GUI,nod32 services）。我想知道一下Kaspersky的又如何，如果system resource不会太高的话，可能考虑用。谢谢你。

Cain

以下是用 taskinfo2003軟件 所獲得的資料﹐ 系統 win98 english.


上圖:
[size=+3]卡巴斯基瑞士 3.5 版本[沒有安裝 control center 組建], 監視器 monitor 3.5 只有一個進程 :
avpm.exe = 內存佔用 ~ 2.55MB
Total=2.55MB

[size=+3]Nod 2.5 有兩個進程 :
nod32kui.exe = 5.56MB
nod32krn.exe=17.96MB
Total=23.52MB



上圖:
[size=+3]卡巴斯基 4.5.0.104 版本[沒有安裝 control center 組建], 監視器 monitor 4.5 有兩個進程 :
avpm.exe (Gui) = 5.20MB
avpm.exe (service) = 18.65MB
Total=23.85MB

[size=+3]Nod 2.5 有兩個進程 :
nod32kui.exe  = 5.56MB
nod32krn.exe=17.96MB
Total=23.52MB

如果沒記錯﹐kaspersky 5.0 有兩三個進程﹐總內存大約 ~ 30MB......
卡巴斯基 4.5 跟 卡巴斯基 5.0 是不同板塊的軟件﹐個人喜歡卡巴斯基 4.5, 比較多設置供更改﹐這也是他的優缺點﹐卡巴斯基5.0是傻瓜似模塊﹐沒有什麼設置供更改。。。。

Cain

以下是轉載: All credits goes to the original poster.

記得﹐每架電腦的結果可能不一樣。不要以為我所獲得的結果會跟你的一樣﹐這些結果牽涉其他因素﹐包括在個別電腦所裝置的其他不是殺毒軟件的程序。
Remember, every PC is different. Just because I got these results doesn't mean they will be the same for you. It depends on a lot of factors including all the other things you have loaded other than your AV.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

[size=+3]Topic: AntiVirus Review - Running Processes and Resources [(mob -- 12th August 2005 - 05:30 PM)
............................................
Hello everyone.

I have tested a couple of AV's to see how much memory each one takes up and how many processes they run. Below you can see my results.

I tested each AV on a clean install of Windows XP SP2 on a Virtual PC with 700mb of ram.

[size=+2]Each AV was installed with it's typical, unaltered default settings. I havn't tweaked any of the AV's,每款殺毒軟件都是以默認值安裝﹐未曾更改默認設定。 the results you see below were all taken with all the default out-of-the-box settings that the AV installs with.

Furthermore, I recorded the memory usage while the PC was at an idle state. So this means, the results you see below are probably as low as they can be... and you should expect the memory usage to be higher during normal use of the PC.

Ok, here are the results, in no particular orde;:

Cain

------------ QUOTE ----------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
AntiVir
AVGNT.exe (2,168 k)
AVGUARD.exe (11,836 k)
AVWUPSRV.exe (2,096 k)
-Total-: 16,100 k

My comments:
Antivir is very light on resources. I didn't play around with this AV for too long but I am sure you can get rid of one of the processes if you turn off the automatic updates.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-----------------------------

------------ QUOTE ----------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
McAfee
McShield.exe (18,988 k)
Mcdetect.exe (5,076k)
McTskshd.exe (2,468 k)
mcvsshld.exe (5,136 k)
mcagent.exe (6,108 k)
McVSEscn.exe (4,756 k)
oasclnt.exe (2,012 k)
-Total-: 44,544 k

My comments:
Stay away from this AV. It is horrible on resources. Even after you uninstall this AV, it leave a process called 2005812111156_mcinfo.exe that loads on startup and takes about 2,348k-5,768k. This is unbelievably ridiculous.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-----------------------------





------------ QUOTE ----------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Panda Titanium Antivirus
PSIMSVC.exe (2,268 k)
AVENGINE.exe (42,828 k)
prevsrv.exe (2,748 k)
PAVSRV51.exe (7,824 k)
PavPrSrv.exe (1,012 k)
PavKre.exe (3,092 k)
pavFnSvr.exe (5,228 k)
APVXDWIN.exe (6,512 k)
Pavfires.exe (5,724 k)
WEBPROXY.exe (1,240 k)
PAVPROT.exe (3,460 k)
-Total-: 81,936 k

My comments:
WTF were they thinking?!? This is the biggest hog of them all. My PC was running significantly slower. Stay away!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-----------------------------





------------ QUOTE ----------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
F-Secure AntiVirus 2005
FSAV32.exe (1,748 k)
fsdfwd.exe (2,596 k)
FAMEH32.exe (1,240 k)
FCH32.exe (1,944 k)
FSMB32.exe (884 k)
fssm32.exe (11,828 k)
FSMA32.exe (884 k)
fsbwsys.exe (2,548 k)
fsgk32.exe (1,380 k)
fspex.exe (2,808 k)
fsgk32st.exe (124 k)
SERVIC~1.exe (2,344 k)
FSM32.exe (4,908 k)
fsguiexe.exe (3,560 k)
-Total-: 38,796 k

My comments:
Too many processes for me to deal with. I can't deal with things like this. It's not the greatest on resources either.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-----------------------------





------------ QUOTE ----------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Kaspersky Personal Pro 5.0.200
KAV.exe (4,556 k)
kavmm.exe (38,128 k)
-Total-: 42,684 k

My comments:
Only 2 running processes, which is nice. But it does eat up your memory. Too much for me... I wouldn't run this as my real time protection.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-----------------------------





------------ QUOTE ----------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Kaspersky Personal Pro 5.0.383
KAV.exe (1,616 k)
kavsvc.exe (25,452 k)
-Total-: 27,068 k

My comments:
This is the latest version of KAV as of 8/13/2005. What a HUGE improvement over the previous version. It still only uses 2 processes which is great. I was impressed to see kavmm.exe has been replaced with the new kavsvc.exe which seems to be a lot better on memory usage. Even KAV.exe looks like it has been improved over the older one as it takes up about 1/3 the memory of the old one. I can tell that KAV is working hard to decrease resource usage with each new release. The way things are going now, version 6.0 looks promising! Who knows what the future holds for KAV, but as long as they keep going in this direction, I'm sure it will be a bright one.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-----------------------------





------------ QUOTE ----------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dr. Web
drwebscd.exe (2,572 k)
spiderml.exe (6,680 k)
spidernt.exe (1,600 k)
spidernt.exe (1,960 k)
-Total-: 12,812 k

My comments:
Wow! What a light AV! And powerful too!. This AV impressed me with its low resource usage so much that I gave it some extra attention that I didn't give the others. I was able to disable drwebscd.exe which is just a scheduler to schedule automatic scans. And I disabled spiderml.exe which is just a real time email scanner which I don't really need. All I had left was the two spidernt.exe processes which totals 3,560 k for excellent real-time protection! Nice!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-----------------------------





------------ QUOTE ----------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
NOD32
nod32kui.exe (720 k)
nod32krn.exe (15,724 k)
-Total-: 16,444 k

My comments:
Amazing! You would think that NOD32, with it's top of the line protection would take up some serious ram. Well, think again! NOD32 has only 2 running processes with a total of 16,444 k of memory usage, which is beautiful. You can have excellent top of the line protection and still not use up any ram. For the average computer these days, NOD32 will feel like it is not even there.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-----------------------------





------------ QUOTE ----------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
F-Prot
F-StopW.exe (1,828 k)
F-Sched.exe (2,700 k)
fpavupdm.exe (2,576 k)
-Total-: 7,104 k

My comments:
OMG! The lightest of them all! And this is a pretty good AV too! Just like Dr. Web, I gave f-prot some extra attention too. I emailed Frisk and asked about the running processes for F-Prot. With their reply I was able to disable F-Sched.exe which is just a scheduler that most people don't need. and I disabled fpavupdm.exe which is only a proccess that checks for definition updates every hour or so. What I had left with was ONE running process, F-StopW.exe which uses less than 2,000 k!! Beautiful!

For those of you who don't know, F-prots real time protection is not like all the other AV's. There are no options. Its real simple. All it does is scan all files on contact and if the file is infected it will block it's execution and tell you to run the on-demand scanner. Simple, and effective.... but some people might preffer an AV that lets you clean/delete/quarantine a file right from the real time protection prompt.

Anyways, Frisk is developing the real time protection for f-prot and they say it will be greatly improved with the next release. Lets wait and see.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-----------------------------





------------ QUOTE ----------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
BitDefender 8 Standard
bdswitch.exe (1,336 k)
bdnagent.exe (892 k)
bdmcon.exe (9,640 k)
vsserv.exe (4,312 k)
bdss.exe (15,832 k)
xcommsvr.exe (3,084 k)
-Total-: 35,096 k

My comments:
Well, I added this AV by request. I used the standard version because it is just an antivirus (which is what I am testing). The Pro version has a firewall and an anti-spyware built in. Anyway, there are too many processes for me to handle here. You wouldn't catch me using this AV... although I do hear good things about it all the time.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-----------------------------



Note:
This forum won't let me have more than 10 Quotes in a post.
So I had to make it look like this:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Avast! Antivirus 4.6 Pro
ashWebSv.exe (384 k)
ashMaiSv.exe (908 k)
ashServ.exe (7,420 k)
ashDisp.exe (4,116 k)
aswUpdSv.exe (192 k)
-Total-: 13,020 k

My comments:
Amazing results as far as memory usage goes. The only thing I hate is that it has 5 processes loaded. I like antiviruses to be as small as possible, and for me at least, anything over 2 processes is too much. Aside from that I was totally impressed with the memory usage... only 13,020k total!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
AntiVir Professional Edition
AVGNT.exe (868 k)
AVGUARD.exe (11,184 k)
AVWUPSRV.exe (2,096 k)
AVESVC.exe (2,900 k)
-Total-: 17,048 k

My comments:
I added this AV by request. The main difference between this one and the free version is that this one has an added process called AVESVC.exe. This professional edition is supposed to have extra protections against viruses worms and trojans. My test shows that there is only about a 1mb difference in memory usage between the free version and this one. For people using the free version, I'd recommend upgrading to this version as you will get better protection for basically the same amount of memory usage.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Symantec Antivirus Corporate 10
VPTray.exe (5,040 k)
ccApp.exe (5,956 k)
Rtvscan.exe (21,260 k)
DefWatch.exe (1,520 k)
ccEvtMgr.exe (2,568 k)
ccSetMgr.exe (3,632 k)
-Total-: 39,976 k

Cain

My comments:
This was added by request. I don't have much to say about it other than the obvious. Way too many processes and memory usage.... at least for me.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

________________________________
________________________________


Please, lets not start a "which AV is better" war. Just because an AV is low on resources doesn't make it GOOD! And just because an AV uses a lot of resources that doesn't mean it is BAD!

The comments I have written are all my own opinions. They are based only on my own testing and they are not meant to be offensive or to start any type of argument. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and we all have different opinions. The important thing to remember is that nobody is right and nobody is wrong.

All I wanted to do was find out which AV uses the least amount of resources... not which one is better.

Remember, every PC is different. Just because I got these results doesn't mean they will be the same for you. It depends on a lot of factors including all the other things you have loaded other than your AV.

You are welcome to post the results from your AV running on your system. As a matter of fact, that's what I want you to do. This way we can see the resource usage of a particular AV across a wide range of different PCs from around the world . Just be sure to include what OS you are using and how much ram you have.

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
轉載畢

ah_beng78

原帖由 Cain 于 1/909/2005 14:17 发表
My comments:
This was added by request. I don't have much to say about it other than the obvious. Way too many processes and memory usage.... at least for me.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -  ...

真感谢你，那么我也写一些比较实际的想法。如下：
我希望的防毒软件不只可以防毒，还可以防trojan，adware，spyware那种，哈哈。。。好像很过分。不过就我所知Nod32和PC-Cillin2003+就可以，其他的我不懂。你觉得如何呢？来交流一下。

Cain

那麼期待你快寫吧。
卡巴斯基 n 年前已經有防 spyware /adware /pornware 之類的病毒庫﹐連接看下面連接﹐自己找。。需要自己更改更新路徑。默認沒有。
http://chinese.cari.com.my/myforum/viewthread.php?tid=355645

http://www.kaspersky.com/extraavupdates

drweb 也開始有 adware 病毒庫﹐需要自己加進去﹐ mcafee 應該有﹐現在如果殺毒軟件都沒有 adware/spyware 病毒庫﹐就是很 outdated 了﹐沒人會採用了。。。。。。
http://beta.drweb.com/

其他的﹐不曉得﹐沒用﹐只知道 drweb 和 卡巴斯基。。。

殺毒軟件都要防 trojan 的﹐。。。。。不必額外加。。

[ 本帖最后由 Cain 于 1-9-2005 06:26 PM 编辑 ]

f-prot 跟 f-secure 不是不一样的软件吗？

f-secure 中有 f-prot, 还有其他的 引擎，可是 f-prot 中只有 f-prot, 没有其他的。