谁能帮我paraphrases这两题？

tongtong93

Q1. "A company that ignores its social responsibility is playing with fire," stated one critic of Nike. Another condemned Nike for glorifying violence and bad taste, and for doing "nothing to promote values, especially among impressionable youngest." Q2. Advertisers and their agencies must be sure their "creative" advertising does not overstep social and legal norms. Most marketers work hard to communicate openly and honestly with customers. Still, abuses occur, and public policy makers have developed a substantial body of laws and regulations to govern advertising.

mlkranger

Q1.
一个批评耐克的人认为 "忽略社会责任的公司不啻在玩火"；而另一个则批评耐克宣扬暴力、没品，并对提升价值观没贡献，尤其是对于易受影响的年轻一代。

Q2.
广告业者或相关代理必须确保他们 “有创意” 的广告不逾越社会及法律规范，而大多数（广告）业务员也尽其努力与顾客开诚布公的沟通（以做到这一点）。无论如何，违例事件依然发生，而立法者也促成了有力的机构及律法来管制广告业。

由于是“断章取义”，Q2 的原文有点 “断层”，帮你加了一些词（在括号中）。