佳礼资讯网

 找回密码
 注册

ADVERTISEMENT

查看: 785|回复: 2

真的假的?

[复制链接]
发表于 17-4-2016 11:37 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
誰有新聞的鏈接?


https://m.facebook.com/story.php ... id=1599939350224250

KPMG, the independent accountant appointed by Opposition Town Council, AHPETC, concluded their findings that the root causes of the lapses were created by the Singapore government's Town Council Act:
"The "root causes" "are fundamental to... systemic difficulties for AHTC in effectively and efficiently discharging its obligations" under the Town Councils Act and financial rules."
KPMG also blamed the multiple lapses to the withdrawal of support by an accounting software company, AIM - a S$2 paid up capital company set up by 3 former PAP MPs. AIM discontinued their accounting services to the Town Council after the Opposition party won Aljunied GRC, as a political move orchestrated by the ruling party.
Another root cause is the leaving of staffs under the town council's financial department. Due to the high profile nature of the mess in financial accounts, most accounting companies are afraid of working with the Opposition Town Council. Two such accounting firms who agreed to work with AHPETC were character-assassinated by the government-controlled media, The Straits Times, who lambasted them for being "an one-man outfit" [See Straits Times report here] and even publishd their resumes in the article suggesting that they are inexperienced.
KPMG also found no wrongdoing or corruption on AHPETC's part. The Ministry of National Development accepted KPMG's explanation and agreed to disburse S$12.9 million of grants it incorrectly withheld over the past 4 years. National Development Minister Lawrence Wong is unavailable for comments on the case despite having the root cause being the Town Council Act.

畢馬威會計師事務所,由反對黨市鎮理事會,AHPETC,委任獨立會計師的結論是失誤的根本原因是由新加坡政府的鎮議會法案設立了他們的發現:
“中的”根源“”是......切實有效地履行其義務AHTC系統性的困難根本“下的市鎮理事會法案和財務規則”。
畢馬威還指責多的失誤,以支持由會計軟件公司撤出,AIM  - 一個S $ 2個付費資本公司成立的前3行動黨議員。 AIM停產其會計服務的鎮議會後,反對黨贏得阿裕尼集選區,由執政黨策劃了一場政治舉動。
另一個根本原因是員工的鎮議會的財務部門下離開。由於財務賬目混亂的高調性質,大多數會計公司都害怕與反對黨鎮議會的工作。誰同意AHPETC工作兩個這樣的會計師事務所是由政府控制的媒體,海峽時報,誰罵得狗血淋頭他們是“一戶一人裝”字符暗殺[見這裡海峽時報報導]甚至publishd自己的簡歷中文章表明它們是經驗不足。
KPMG還發現AHPETC的一部分,沒有任何不當行為或腐敗。國家發展部接受了畢馬威會計師事務所的解釋,並同意支付萬新$ 12.9助學金它錯誤地扣留在過去的4年。國家發展部長勞倫斯·黃是對案件的意見不可用,儘管有根本原因是鎮議會法案。
回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

 楼主| 发表于 18-4-2016 12:05 AM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
好像素假的。。。

回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 18-4-2016 12:20 AM | 显示全部楼层
比起马国的1MDP的account audit report,简直是天渊之别~





回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

 

ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT


版权所有 © 1996-2023 Cari Internet Sdn Bhd (483575-W)|IPSERVERONE 提供云主机|广告刊登|关于我们|私隐权|免控|投诉|联络|脸书|佳礼资讯网

GMT+8, 16-11-2025 05:11 AM , Processed in 0.101503 second(s), 24 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表