敬请大家小心～死卡变活卡～

ps_ng

死卡变活卡

两年前已经被取消的Sxxx Cxxx 卡，今年九月没经过我的同意下突然重开，没有通知就寄来我的住处，怎知被别人偷偷签收，上个礼拜突然接到银行打来的电话说我的卡被刷RM2700多:@ :@ :@ 当场傻掉!!!
又有谁会想到两年前的死卡会突然复活？他们还笑嘻嘻答：这是我们免费送你的～～天～～ 还讲不必ACTIVAVE就能直接用
他们的MARKETING部门会为了赚取每张卡RM60-70 COMISSION 而随便重开已经被顾客剪掉的卡，大家小心！！！直接告上BANK NEGARA吧。他们太过分了:@ :@ :@ 完全不顾顾客的安全。现在被他们害惨了，还敢讲如果不还MINIMUM会 BLACK LIST！！！真是混蛋:@ :@ :@ ！！！绝对反抗到底！！！

大家要多加留意～真的很危险

梦想之追求者

银行为了赚那RM50是酱的咯
突然给你,还直接寄到你家里,哈!
去国家银行投诉吧,http://www.bnm.gov.my/

苹子树

那你会去还钱吗？？？

eva19

Financial Mediation BUREAU
www.fmb.org.my

theblues

有一条rule 说只需还rm250的不是？

theblues

Most unaware of RM250 limited liability
Posted on December 22, 2007

CARDHOLDERS need not pay more than RM250 whenever their lost or stolen credit cards are used by others. Yet, oftentimes, they end up paying much more.
This is because Bank Negara has not informed cardholders that they do not have to pay more than RM250 for fraudulent transactions carried out using their lost or stolen cards, when they had not acted fraudulently and had informed the banks about the lost or stolen cards as soon as possible.
This protection is given under Clause 13.2 of Bank Negara’s Credit Card Guideline (“The cardholder’s maximum liability for unauthorised transactions as a consequence of a lost or stolen credit card shall be confined to a limit specified by the issuer of credit cards, which shall not exceed RM250 provided the cardholder has not acted fraudulently or has not failed to inform the issuer of credit cards as soon as reasonably practicable after having found that his credit card is lost or stolen”).
Banks know about Clause 13.2 but have chosen to ignore it. Instead they pursue cardholders for the fraudulent transactions. They will tell cardholders that a clause in the credit card contracts states that all transactions carried out before the loss of the cards are reported to the banks, are deemed to be carried out by the cardholders.
Many cardholders then pay up because they are unaware of the RM250 limited liability.
Bank Negara should rule that:
THE RM250 maximum liability on fraudulent transactions is highlighted to cardholders in the card agreements as well as in the monthly card statements.
BANKS are not allowed to insert any clause in the card agreement which is contrary to Clause 13.2.
BANKS should refund all money in excess of the RM250 collected from cardholders whose cases clearly come under Clause 13.2.
By S.M. MOHAMED IDRIS,
President,
Consumers Association of Penang

http://blawg.joshua3.com/?p=8

ps_ng

谢谢大家～
一定写信COMPLAIN到底
觉得这些钱应该丢回给那些乱发卡的职员赔偿最好。那样他们就不敢乱来！！！
为啥现在的卡不必ACTIVAVE就能使用的？难道他们想省钱不必请酱多接线员？

还有那些商家为什么帮顾客刷卡时不看清楚资料才刷？看见卡的名字跟那个人男女不对称或种族不对称也照样过关，真的无言

daniel5061

楼主，知道是谁刷了你的卡吗？投诉postman信用卡一定要owner签收才可以的，之前我的卡叫佣人签收postman都不肯，然后再向BANK NEGARA投诉～～

ps_ng

楼主，知道是谁刷了你的卡吗？投诉postman信用卡一定要owner签收才可以的，之前我的卡叫佣人签收postman都不 ...
daniel5061 发表于 9-12-2009 12:30 PM

的确有怀疑名单。估计他还不懂我已经知道。
等我搞定银行的问题后会报警抓人:@ 一定要他接受法律惩罚！！！刷到酱爽！！！

cyyong74

谢谢大家～
为啥现在的卡不必ACTIVAVE就能使用的？难道他们想省钱不必请酱多接线员？

一些銀行可能為了省那一點點掛號費／快遞費，信用卡都用平郵寄出了...

sunofapril

这么大单啊。哦噢，我还保留着这家银行的卡

vivienne

现在 只要跟着 sms 步骤 就能 activate 卡了

Squall_Lee

死卡变活卡

两年前已经被取消的Sxxx Cxxx 卡，今年九月没经过我的同意下突然重开，没有通知就寄来我的住 ...
ps_ng 发表于 9-12-2009 11:18

    怎么这么大件事情？不过你投诉也是要一段很长的时间里！

suansuan

啊。。。有点乱， 到底是去Financial Mediation BUREAU投诉还是去Bank Negara投诉呢？

小蚊子

的确有怀疑名单。估计他还不懂我已经知道。
等我搞定银行的问题后会报警抓人 一定要他接受法律惩罚 ...
ps_ng 发表于 9-12-2009 12:52 PM

不会是你邻居或亲人盗用吧？{:2_71:}

kjleong

真是混蛋:@:@
去Bank Negara投诉.....
报警抓人.......

ps_ng

昨晚再次打电话致Sxxx Cxxx确认了是那个王八蛋签收我的卡，等下中午可以去告发他咯～

回复小蚊子：等一切落实再告诉你详情

小蚊子

昨晚再次打电话致Sxxx Cxxx确认了是那个王八蛋签收我的卡，等下中午可以去告发他咯～

回复小蚊子 ...
ps_ng 发表于 10-12-2009 09:04 AM

有最新消息吗？{:2_78:}

vivienne

昨晚再次打电话致Sxxx Cxxx确认了是那个王八蛋签收我的卡，等下中午可以去告发他咯～

回复小蚊子 ...
ps_ng 发表于 10-12-2009 09:04

    期待知道结果   

tansks

还有下文吗？很期待一下。