未来5年, 你认为国防部应该再定购什么重要军备

qwerty223

馬2003年向俄訂購6蘇愷戰機料5月送抵      
2007-02-16 20:09:33 MYT

（吉隆坡訊）大馬皇家空軍今日（週五，16日）指出，大馬向俄羅斯訂購的6架蘇愷（Sukhoi-30MKM）戰機預料於今年5月送抵大馬。

大馬皇家空軍發表文告說，這是大馬於2003年訂購首批18架蘇愷戰機的其中6架。

“首批戰機原訂於今年4月在俄羅斯正式移交給大馬政府，實際送抵大馬的日期則是5月。”

大馬皇家空軍駁斥《新海峽時報》指首批戰機將延遲1年“交貨”給大馬的報導。

大馬耗資9億令吉向俄羅斯訂購18架蘇愷戰機，這使大馬繼印度和越南之後，成為本區域內擁有最大批先進戰機的國家之一。

《新海峽時報》週四（15日）的報導指出，有關戰機延遲“交貨”，其中一個原因是大馬要求將以色列製造的零件更換為其他國家的零件。

《新海峽時報》引述匿名消息人士的談話指印度、以色列和法國3國製造的航空電子零件已經被俄羅斯與法國零件取代，而以色列製造的電子對策系統也被換成南非製造的系統。

大馬皇家空軍公關朱斯菲里拉迪夫表示，更換以色列零件的課題並不存在，因為賣方是根據大馬皇家空軍的要求來裝置零件的。 （星洲日報‧2007.02.16）

納吉：向俄購買蘇愷型6戰機5月運抵      
2007-01-22 20:09:39 MYT

■大馬維和部隊臨飛聯合國駐黎巴嫩臨時總部之前，納吉（前排右）上機與大馬維和部隊團長莫哈末達立（右二）握手道別。左一和二分別為國防衛隊首長丹斯里莫哈末安華、陸軍首長拿督斯里阿都阿茲。(放大)
（首邦市訊）副首相兼國防部長拿督斯里納吉說，大馬向俄羅斯購買的蘇愷（Sukhoi）型戰機，將在今年5月運抵。

他指出，屆時運抵的蘇愷型戰機有6架。

他受詢及有報導指蘇愷型戰機將延遲運抵大馬的問題，在新聞發佈會上這麼回應。

較早時，納吉在梳邦空軍機場向283名陸軍、空軍和海軍各41人組成的聯合國維和部隊道別。

納吉說，這是大馬第3批參與聯和國維和部隊的軍人，以赴黎巴嫩南部，負責執行以色列及黎巴嫩達成停火協議任務。

“他們週一（22日）早上乘坐租用的馬航747飛機飛往黎巴嫩，展開6個月維和任務。”

“之前首批100人的國防衛隊，已在1月2日飛往黎巴嫩，次批則於1月4日從巴生港口出發，以聯同重型軍備開往黎巴嫩首都貝魯特。” （星洲日報‧2007/01/22）

嘿嘿~~ 苏凯们回家咯！很期待公开的那天呢！可惜我无法出席今年的LIMA

kcchiew

买再多的军备， 不会保养也是徒然。

副防長：蛀蝕建築物白蟻襲軍營搞破壞



（亞庇訊）副國防部長拿督再那阿比丁辛披露，大馬有許多軍營受白蟻“攻擊”，以致不少建築物遭破壞。

他說，部門已成立一個工作委員會，準備對此進行討論並尋求解決方法。


他表示，受白蟻侵蝕的軍營建築物，包括學校，將被重建或修茸。

副部長週五（2月23日）下午是巡視此間昔邦加軍營時向新聞從業員發表談話。他說，全國有80多個軍營，受白蟻破壞的軍營數目相當多，沙巴也有此情況。

“除了白蟻問題，我們也將提升軍營的其他備，包括營內學校之軟硬體設備。以前，國防部不插手教育事宜，如今，我們認為有責任改善營中的學校軟硬體設備，進一步提昇軍人子女的教育，以讓軍人對妻兒無後顧之憂。”

他表示，國防部與教育部經達致協議，營中學校教育基本上由教育部負責，而國防部則給予協助。

全國軍營共有37間小學，4間中學，2萬5000名學生。副部長說，其部門希望軍營學校將擁有本身的草場與禮堂，軟體設備包括電腦。“營中學校表現不俗，在2006年小學六年級檢定考試排名全國第三。”

副部長是於本週三前來沙巴，出席武裝部隊軍營管理會議之餘，也到仙本那、斗湖、哥打毛律等地視察與訪問。這也是促進軍人及家屬之親善活動之一。 （星洲日報‧2007.02.24）

[ 本帖最后由 kcchiew 于 25-2-2007 12:46 AM 编辑 ]

阿修罗3

原帖由 kcchiew 于 24-2-2007 08:17 PM 发表
买再多的军备， 不会保养也是图然。

你说得很对！
不然的话再好也会坏的！

qwerty223

Report: Malaysia To Receive Russian Jets in May
BY AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE, KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA


Malaysia will take delivery of the first batch of Russian-built Sukhoi jets in May after a yearlong delay partly due to the replacement of components made by Israel, a report said Thursday.
The New Straits Times, quoting unnamed defense industry sources, said six of the 18 30-MKM Sukhois ordered in a billion-dollar deal would be delivered to the Royal Malaysian Air Force in May.
“Part of the delay is attributed to the fitting of non-Israeli components,” the newspaper quoted a source as saying.
Malaysia does not have diplomatic ties with Israel and is a longtime critic of the Jewish state’s policies in the Middle East.
“Russian and French-made avionics replaced the Indian-Israeli-French combination, while the Israeli electronic countermeasure system was changed to a South African variant,” the source said.
Delivery of the jets is part of a deal conceived in 2003, when Russia agreed to send a Malaysian astronaut to the space station in return for the purchase of 18 Sukhoi 30-MKM fighter jets.
The Sukhois eventually will replace the RMAF’s 14 20-year-old U.S.-made F-5E jets and complement its 18 MiG-29N Fulcrums, the newspaper said.
Indian firm Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, which is assembling 140 Su-30MKI jets for the Indian Air Force, will provide the RMAF with technical support for equipment such as auxiliary power units, as well as spares, it said.

一篇老文，但是他们却说有14架F-5E，看来这个是准确数字了？

cheein

原帖由 pfg1group 于 6-2-2007 01:18 AM 发表

你的那篇文章是关于什么的，
先报告来听。

我最近也是找到很多类似的文章， 尤其是导弹飞控的。
用大学的resources找到很多。
全部pdf file,
大致上需要differential equations 来算。
我的噩梦。
...

能不能发给我啊？？
我学气动的～～～

cheein

也发给我吧？？
渴望当中～～～

qwerty223

原帖由 cheein 于 27-2-2007 03:59 PM 发表
也发给我吧？？
渴望当中～～～

你学气动的啊？呵呵~ 那位老大好像是学流体的？你们是一家？
我学机械的...
你要拿一些啊？

csfantasy11

应该买AWACS,以防领国的空军力量。

d_X_scythe

是时候买AWACS了. 空军要代替NURI已买NH90直升机来CSAR服务。

qwerty223

當初的一篇趣聞~

How a helicopter deal flew into trouble                           

By Mark Forbes
June 17 2002

Singapore's aerospace conference showcaseda plethora of civilian and military hardware at the Changi ExhibitionCentre in February. Nine hundred exhibitors offered a high-techselection of weapons, executive jets, supersonic stealth fighters -even spacecraft design.

Senator Robert Hill, a newcomer to thissecret world of defence business, was soaking it in as he strolled theexhibit's aisles, until he stumbled across Kaman Aerospace's stand. Hefroze.

In pride of place was a poster of its Seaspritehelicopter, with the declaration "The right choice for the RoyalAustralian Navy". According to bystanders, the unfortunate salesman hadjust begun his spiel when Senator Hill informed him he was no less thanthe Australian Defence Minister and was far from convinced the navy hadmade the right choice when it signed up with Kaman to supply 11Seasprite helicopters. Costs had blown out to more than $1 billion, hetold the startled salesman, and the project was running three yearslate - if Kaman could deliver at all.

Today, Senator Hill is farless eager to discuss the Seasprite. He has refused to be interviewedon the subject. A spokeswoman said the minister would speak "when hehad something new to say about the Kaman contract". He even blocked arequest to photograph the unfinished helicopters - they are expected tobe operational in 2006 - stored in a Nowra hangar that has already costthe government $30 million.

An investigation by The Age hasuncovered major flaws in the government's handling of the project.According to leading figures in Australia's defence community, theleast of the Seasprite's problems are their refurbished, Vietnam-eraairframes that have attracted criticism in recent weeks.

           advertisement
         
          advertisement

"Weshould never have bought them in the first place," said Aldo Borgu, anadviser to former defence ministers John Moore and Peter Reith and nowa director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. The plan tobuild a unique helicopter was unrealistic and poorly executed, and wasdesigned for a proposed Offshore Patrol Vessel (OPV) to be builtjointly with Malaysia. The patrol vessel never got off the ground.

"Once the OPV didn't go ahead, the rationale for buying a smaller helicopter disappeared," Mr Borgu said.

Thepatrol vessel project was a favourite of the Keating government,proposed by major ALP donor Transfield (now Tenix). The Defence Forcehierarchy was always wary of a project it believed was driven by adesire for export dollars, and its fears increased after theCoalition's election in March, 1996.

Put simply, said one seniorofficial, the boat was "neither fish nor fowl", too big for aconventional patrol boat, too small to combat a frigate. To expand itsrange and firepower it needed a helicopter, but the vessel was toosmall to carry the Seahawks already planned for the Anzac frigates.

Tenderswere called for a small, state-of-the-art helicopter. The former chiefof navy, Don Chalmers, confirmed that the Seasprites were acquired forthe patrol vessels, OPV, although it was also planned to place some onthe Anzacs. Despite this, Defence and the government failed to formallylink the Seasprite and patrol vessel projects.

In Senateestimates hearings this month, Air Vice-Marshal Ray Conroy attempted tofudge over when the patrol vessel project was dropped. "That waseffectively abandoned in February, 1998, when Malaysia selected aGerman tender over the one submitted by the Australian company," hesaid.

At that point, the argument for buying the Seaspriteinstead of more of the larger Seahawk collapsed, Air Vice-MarshalConroy admitted. But he said the argument was hypothetical as theSeasprite contract was signed earlier, in June, 1997.

In fact,Malaysia announced the patrol vessel decision in October, 1997, butearlier that year in March the Howard cabinet was told the deal wouldnot go ahead and the vessel was unsuitable for the Australian Navy.

Ata cabinet meeting in Pakenham on March 11, former defence minister IanMcLachlan presented a call from the then Defence Force chief, GeneralJohn Baker, to suspend the patrol vessel proposal.

"I don't want to embarrass anybody, but we felt the thing was heading south," Mr McLachlan said this week.

"Aswell, we were in a position of having to buy some vessels that were notappropriate for replacing either the Fremantle patrol boats or warshipsand we didn't want to do that.

"All the information I couldglean was the Malaysians were cooling off on the whole deal. It was abig order but got smaller as the months went on and we thought it mightnever come to pass and it didn't."

Government sources confirmedthat the cabinet had effectively decided to suspend the patrol vesselproject, but no decision was announced after strenuous objections byForeign Affairs Minister Alexander Downer and fears that anannouncement would be portrayed as scuttling Transfield's Malaysiantender.

"There was a problem with not connecting the helicopterpurchase to the OPV purchase," Mr Borgu said. "When cabinet decided tokill off the OPV nobody thought about the Seasprites. It's adding anadditional helicopter platform to the ADF unnecessarily as the Anzacscould take the Seahawks."

A senior member of the Seaspriteproject agrees the deal should have been scrapped. "It's smarter to get27 Seahawks rather than 16 Seahawks and 11 Seasprites," he said.

MrMcLachlan said he has no recollection of the Defence Force ever tellinghim of the pivotal link between the patrol vessel project and theSeasprites.

One of Defence's most senior officials at the timealso did not "recall a lot of discussion about cancelling the Seaspritewhen the OPV hit the fence. I don't think it was looked at carefullyand that's perhaps where we made a mistake."

Despite the beliefthat the patrol vessel the Seasprites were designed for would never bebuilt, Defence - never keen to reject already-committed funds - wentahead and signed the $660 million helicopter contract with Kaman.

Thatcontract contained the seeds of today's fiasco, Defence insiders admit.Ever ambitious, Defence wanted to build a high-tech helicopter at abargain price. The number of helicopters ordered had shrunk to fitunder the price cap and it was determined to go for an option thatwould cut costs further, rebuilding surplus US navy helicopters up to40 years old.

Mr McLachlan said: "I do remember a long series ofdiscussions about the problem that now appears to have arisen, and thatis: if you buy something with old frames, will everybody say they areold aircraft?"

The second-hand helicopter purchase has beenpilloried, but those involved in the project are adamant the issue isoverblown. A team of 10 has supervised the selection of helicoptersfrom their shrink-wrapped storage in the Arizona desert and overseenthe removal of corrosion from the frames.

Expecting Kaman toinstall a new, sophisticated weapons and avionics system into these"old birds" is where the project came to grief, insiders said.

Toomuch was expected of Kaman in too short a time. The Seasprite deal wasKaman's biggest ever and the company was no big-time defence player.Founded by eccentric inventor Charlie Kaman, who also designed theOvation electric guitar, it has made more in recent years from musicalinstrument sales than aerospace. "The Commonwealth has signed up to anunachievable contract at an unachievable price," said one senior memberof the project team. "The whole thing was set up for failure."

Itwas unfair to blame Kaman, said one official who played a key role inthe contract. "Defence has to realise you can't lay all the risk andblame on this little company," he said.

The official said thecontract had no damages clauses because liquidated damages on a dealthis size would put Kaman out of business.

The head of theDefence Materiel Organisation, Mick Roche, has said the contract is"not the sort of contract we would wish to draw up these days". In aspeech to a Defence seminar earlier this year he said Defence's projectmanagement should have ensured effective penalty clauses and preventeda key software contractor walking away, resulting in seven helicoptersbeing delivered without a mission-control system.

Installingthis sophisticated control system had been subcontracted to US firmLitton, a major military company that dwarfed Kaman. Soon afteraccepting the contract, Litton won a much bigger US deal and moved manykey staff from the Seasprite project.

cont

[ 本帖最后由 qwerty223 于 7-3-2007 08:03 PM 编辑 ]

qwerty223

cont...

In 1999 Litton decided to walk away from the complex task, and under its contract won a settlement that cost Kaman $32 million. Australian firm CSC has now been contracted for the task, but the project is already more than three years' late.

Defence is trying to redraft Kaman's contract, despite having already paid out $960 million of the $1 billion budget. Last month Mr Roche told a Senate hearing the government was examining suing Kaman for breach of contract and could possibly recover that money, but then "we will not end up with the helicopters and will have to start again, that is the dilemma we are in".

Another dilemma remains for the navy. Even if it does receive working helicopters, the boats they were designed for do not exist. Putting the Seasprites on the existing Anzac frigates makes less sense. The Seasprites carry an anti-surface missile, the Penguin, originally intended to cover for the patrol vessel's lack of such a weapon, but the Anzacs already carry the Harpoon anti-surface missile.

A former defence official said the Seasprites created profound logistics and maintenance problems for the navy, with it having five different helicopters for five different uses. Air force chief Angus Houston has overall responsibility for air capability but pointedly refused to endorse the Seasprite purchase when interviewed. Asked if the Seahawk would have been a better choice with the patrol vessel off the scene and if the Seasprite was one helicopter too many for the military, Air Marshal Houston replied: "I'd prefer not to make a judgment on that, you can draw your own conclusions. I think we do have too many helicopter types."

"You can't dispute it's the wrong helicopter," Mr Borgu said. "There are obvious question marks over the Penguin anti-ship missile as opposed to the Harpoon, and the anti-sub capability isn't as good as the Seahawks. We should have got the Seahawks. On balance the ADF would have been better off."

Mark Forbes is The Age's defence correspondent.

想不到我們的影響力如斯？

绝影柯能

首先，我想问，马来西亚的国防注要是针对哪一个方面？邻国？海盗？恐袭？还是争夺南沙群岛的主权？

个人认为，未来五年，应该注重打击海盗和提防恐袭。所以，军备方面也应该从这方面发展。潜艇，巡逻舰/艇，直升机和快速反应部队的配备。

还有，先进的训练设备也很重要。

cheein

我都想要，呵呵，贪心啊～～～
你在哪里念书啊？？

cheein

将来强调的是全方位发展，你说的第一句都应该是国家都必须考虑的。

qwerty223

Joining ceremony for the first Scorpene submarine
Cherbourg, 14 March 2007


The Chief of Staff of the Malaysian Navy, Admiral Ramlan, and the Chief of Staff of the French Navy, Admiral Oudot de Dainville, were present at the ceremony commemorating the joining of the fore- and aft-sections of the first Scorpene submarine being built for the Malaysian Navy. Also in attendance were the Chief Executive Officer of DCN, Jean-Marie Poimboeuf, along with representatives of DCN, Armaris and Navantia.

The contract was originally signed in June 2002 between the Malaysian Government, DCN and the Spanish shipbuilder, Navantia. It concerns the building of two Scorpene-class submarines, and also covers a contract for training Malaysian crews in submarine handling and operations. These two contracts will allow the Royal Malaysian Navy to acquire a first class submarine force.

The resistant and highly-elastic hulls of the two submarines were each built in two sections by DCN in Cherbourg (thus four sections overall for the two vessels). This concept allowed for modular, parallel construction. While Navantia undertook the manufacturing and installation of vital equipment and furnishings in the two aft-sections of the vessels in Cartagena, Spain, DCN Cherbourg did the same on the two fore-sections, which included, among other things, the combat system. The finished aft-section of the two sections ; later the aft-section of the second submarine will be transferred from Cherbourg to Cartagena for its final assembly.

Armaris, a joint venture of DCN and Thales, is the overall prime contractor for the Malaysian submarine program. DCN shares industrial prime contracting and design responsibilities of the Scorpene-class submarine with its Spanish partner, Navantia.

Capable of operating in both brown and blue waters, the Scorpene is armed with Blackshark wire-guided torpedoes and Exocet SM 39 sub-launched, anti-surface-ship missiles. It can undertake a wide range of missions : dissuasion, superiority on the high seas, naval blockades, information-gathering, landing or retrieval of Special Froces, etc. It can operate alone or in combination with air and sea forces. Ten submarines have been sold around the world : Chile (two vessels), Malaysia (two vessels) and India (six vessels). The Scorpene is already a benchmark on the world conventional submarine market.

source:Embassy of France in Malaysia

马来西亚首艘Scorpene前后舰体接装仪式。

[ 本帖最后由 qwerty223 于 14-4-2007 05:48 PM 编辑 ]

將神

武裝直升機吧,以大馬多山的情況來看,加強機動力是必要的.

毛笔

其实我觉得最需要该轮到武装直升机了。
其实不只是阿帕奇一个选择，还有其他如南非的茶隼，苏联的米-28。。等
米-24更好，一架敏捷的格斗运输武装直升机。可以进行格斗，反坦克，步兵并运输任务！像我国这种多丛林和山区的国家，这种直升机一举两得！


茶隼

米-28

米-24

qwerty223

07 4月4日 PT-91M在马来西亚越野测试实拍

毛笔

原帖由 qwerty223 于 16-4-2007 09:38 PM 发表
07 4月4日 PT-91M在马来西亚越野测试实拍

哪里找的？又实录分享吗？
请问哪里有得找大马军演的片断？

qwerty223

原帖由 毛笔 于 17-4-2007 09:31 AM 发表


哪里找的？又实录分享吗？
请问哪里有得找大马军演的片断？

我只有这张照片，无意中在Janes的公开画册看到。